Rotational motion and angular momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving rotational motion and angular momentum, specifically focusing on a pendulum system with given masses and lengths. Participants explore concepts related to moment of inertia, kinetic energy, and conservation of energy in the context of angular displacement and height reached by the pendulum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for moment of inertia and angular velocity, question the correctness of angles derived from energy conservation, and explore the effects of initial conditions on the height reached by a pendulum. There are inquiries about rounding errors and clarity in the working steps.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on avoiding rounding errors and clarified the interpretation of angular displacement. There is an ongoing exploration of how initial pushes affect the pendulum's height, with differing opinions on the outcomes based on energy conservation principles.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can provide or the methods they can use. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in calculations and interpretations of physical principles.

hquang001
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Two 2.00 kg balls are attached to the ends of a thin rod of length 50.0 cm and negligible mass. The rod is free to rotate in a vertical plane without friction about a horizontal axis through its center. With the rod initially horizontal, a 50.0 g wad of wet putty drops onto one of the balls, hitting it with a speed of 3.00 m/s and then sticking to it.
(a) What is the angular speed of the system just after the putty wad hits?
(b) What is the ratio of the kinetic energy of the system after the collision to that of the putty wad just before?
( c) Through what angle will the system rotate before it momentarily stops?
Relevant Equations
[tex] L_{initial} = L_{final} [/tex]
[tex] K_{initial} + PE_{initial} = K_{final} + PE_{final} [/tex]
mball = 2 kg, mputty = 0.05 kg, L = 0.5 m, v = 3m/s
a) Moment of inertia : I = (2mball + mputty ). ¼ L^2 = 0.253125 kg.m^2

Linitial = Lfinal => mputty. v. r = I.ω => ω = (4.mputty.v.r) / I = 0.148 rad/s

b) K initial = 1/2 m v^2 = 0.225 J
K final = 1/2 Iω^2 = 2.85.10^(-3) J => Kfinal / Kinitial = 0.013

c) Using conservation of energy :K initial +PE initial = K final + PE final
1/2 I.ω^2 + 0 = 0 + (mball + mputty).g.(-h) + mball.g.h
158053457_296620081898095_8345120285906046267_n.jpg

1/2 I.ω^2 = (2.05).g. (-sinΘ . L/2 ) + (2).g.(sinΘ . L/2)
=> 1/2 I.ω^2 = g.sinΘ . L/2 . (2 - 2.05) => Θ = -1.3°
I think the angle should be larger than 180 => 180° - (-1.3°) = 181°

I don't know if my answer for question c is correct or not
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It all looks right. It should definitely be 181.3°, of course.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
Edit - typo's corrected.

If you release a simple pendulum (negligible friction/air resistance) what height does it reach on the other side, and why?

If you give the same pendulum a small downwards push at the moment of release, what can you say about the height it reaches on the other side, and why?

I get a very slightly different answer to you for part b). This could be caused by a small rounding error in your calculation. (Don't use rounded values in intermediate steps.) Your working isn't clear enough for me to check what you've done in detail but the method is OK.

As noted by @PeroK, you are asked through what angle the system rotates - not what angle it makes relative to its starting position.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
Steve4Physics said:
If you release a simple pendulum (negligible friction/air resistance) what height does it reach on the other side, and why?
I think it should reach the same height because there is no outside force. we can proof it by using conservation of energy
PE initial = PE final => mgh1 = mgh2 => h1 = h2
Steve4Physics said:
If you give the same pendulum a small downwards push at the moment of release, what can you say about the height it reaches on the other side, and why?
Does it reach greater height than original height ? I'm not sure about this
Steve4Physics said:
I get a very slightly different answer to you for part b). This could be caused by a small rounding error in your calculation. (Don't use rounded values in intermediate steps.) Your working isn't clear enough for me to check what you've done in detail but the method is OK.

- for part b). yes you're right. As i rounded the value of angular speed 0.148 to 0.15 rad/s so the answer is not quite correct. The final kinetic energy should be 2.77.10^(-3) J => the ratio is 0.0123
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
hquang001 said:
Does it [a pendulum] reach greater height than original height [if given an initial push] ? I'm not sure about this
If you are holding a pendulum (at an angle) and give it an initial push, it will reach a bigger height compared to merely releasing it. The extra gravitational potential energy equals the extra initial kinetic energy you gave it (conservation of energy).

Applying the same argument to the original problem, you should see that the rod must rotate more than 180º, not less.

And you've sorted out the rounding error. Yay!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hquang001
@hquang001 here's a way to avoid rounding errors.

Let ##r## be half the length of the rod, ##m## the mass of the putty, ##M## the mass of each ball, ##u## the initial speed of the putty and ##v## the speed of each ball immediately after the collision.
$$L_i = mur = (2M + m)vr = L_f $$ $$\therefore v = \mu u, \ \text{where} \ \mu = \frac{m}{2M+m}$$
For part a): $$\omega = \frac{v}{r} = \frac{\mu u}{ r}$$
For part b): $$\frac{KE_f}{KE_i} = \frac{(2M+m)v^2}{mu^2} = \frac{1}{\mu}\mu^2 = \mu$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hquang001 and Steve4Physics

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
67
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K