How Does Rotational Velocity Affect Gravity and Space Launches?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between rotational velocity and gravitational force, specifically how these factors influence the sensation of weight and the energy required for space launches. It is established that if Earth rotated 17.04 times faster, objects on its surface would experience weightlessness due to increased centripetal force. Additionally, a planet with greater mass and rotational velocity can maintain the same effective gravity at its surface, yet launching a mass into space would require the same energy if gravitational and centrifugal forces are balanced. The conversation emphasizes the importance of latitude in the effects of centrifugal force on gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational and centrifugal forces
  • Knowledge of planetary rotation and its effects on weight
  • Familiarity with basic physics concepts related to mass and energy
  • Concept of effective gravity in relation to planetary characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of rotational velocity on gravitational force
  • Explore the concept of effective gravity in different planetary environments
  • Study the physics of launching objects from various planetary surfaces
  • Investigate the role of latitude in gravitational and centrifugal forces
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, students studying planetary science, and anyone interested in the dynamics of gravity and space exploration.

Taremos
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I was thinking, the amount of "gravity" a person feels on the surface of a planet is not only dependent on gravity, but also the centripetal force...

For example, if Earth spun 17.04 times as fast as it does now (i.e. 1 day = 1.4 hours) then anything on the surface of the Earth would essentially be orbiting it, and would feel weightless!

Also, a planet with much more mass than Earth could have the same effective gravity at the surface if it had a larger radius or rotational velocity.

The only thing that's a little fuzzy to me is the effects this would have on actually launching things into space. A planet with higher mass and velocity with the same effective gravity on the surface would still make require much more energy to launch a mass into space, right?

Discuss.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Taremos said:
A planet with higher mass and velocity with the same effective gravity on the surface would still make require much more energy to launch a mass into space, right?
No. If the force ##F_{gravitational} - F_{centrifugal}## is the same on both planets (at some particular latitudes), than you need the same amount of energy.

Note: in this context I assume that "launching a mass into space" means just to leave the surface for a short instant (to consider a stable orbit or escaping the gravitational field entirely, we would need to work with particular values, including the size of the planet). Next, I also assume that the planet is perfectly spherical and homogeneous, so the (true) gravitational acceleration is the same everywhere on the surface (we are ignoring any effects of the rotation on the structure and shape of the planet).

Taremos said:
For example, if Earth spun 17.04 times as fast as it does now (i.e. 1 day = 1.4 hours) then anything on the surface of the Earth would essentially be orbiting it, and would feel weightless!
Only at the equator (the centrifugal force depends on latitude). As you move further toward any of the pole, the centrifugal effect would diminish and the resulting force would pull objects toward the surface. On the poles, the rotation of the planet doesn't provide any centrifugal force to counteract the gravity.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K