RThe canonical representation phi (measure theory) (Royden)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The canonical representation of the function ρ in measure theory, as described in Royden's 3rd edition, is defined as ρ = ƩaiχAi(x), where Ai are disjoint measurable sets and ai are distinct nonzero values. This representation is characterized by its simplicity, as ρ is a simple function that assumes a finite number of values. The discussion clarifies that the canonical representation effectively divides ρ into single-step functions, each corresponding to different constant values over disjoint intervals. Additionally, the concept of Borel sets is introduced, defined as sets in the smallest σ-algebra containing all open sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measure theory concepts, specifically simple functions
  • Familiarity with characteristic functions, denoted as χE
  • Knowledge of σ-algebras and their properties
  • Basic graphing skills to visualize step functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simple functions in measure theory
  • Learn about the construction and significance of Borel sets
  • Explore the concept of σ-algebras in depth
  • Practice graphing step functions to solidify understanding of canonical representations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on measure theory, functional analysis, and related fields. This discussion is beneficial for anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of canonical representations and Borel sets.

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12
RThe "canonical representation phi" (measure theory) (Royden)

Homework Statement



I need some help understanding the canonical representation of phi as described on p. 77 of Rodyen's 3rd edition. I've transcribed it below for those of you who don't own the book.

Homework Equations



The dunction χE defined by

χE(x) = 1 if x ε E; 0 if x [STRIKE]ε[/STRIKE] E

is called the characteristic function of E. A linear combination

ρ(x) = ƩaiχEi(x)

is called a simple function if the sets Ei are measurable. This representation for ρ is not unique. However, we note that a function ρ is simply if and only if it is measurable and assume only a finite number of values. If ρ is a simple function and {a1, ..., an} the set of nonzero values of ρ, then

ρ = ƩaiχAi(x),

where Ai = {x: ρ(x) = ai}. This representation for ρ is called the canonical representation, and it is characterized by the fact that the Ai are disjoint and the ai distinct and nonzero.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I understand the ρ(x): there are coefficients ai corresponding to each of the measurable sets Ei, and for a given x the function ρ(x) simply sums up the ai corresponding to the sets containing x. However, the definition of ρ, the "canonical representation," is eluding me.

Any help appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Jamin2112! :smile:
Jamin2112 said:
… However, we note that a function ρ is simply if and only if it is measurable and assume only a finite number of values. If ρ is a simple function and {a1, ..., an} the set of nonzero values of ρ, then

ρ = ƩaiχAi(x),

where Ai = {x: ρ(x) = ai}. This representation for ρ is called the canonical representation, and it is characterized by the fact that the Ai are disjoint and the ai distinct and nonzero.

So I understand the ρ(x): there are coefficients ai corresponding to each of the measurable sets Ei, and for a given x the function ρ(x) simply sums up the ai corresponding to the sets containing x. However, the definition of ρ, the "canonical representation," is eluding me.

essentially, ρ is a step function with n steps

the canonical representation is the obvious one which divides ρ into single-step functions, each with steps of different heights :wink:
 


Take a simple example. Let ##E_1=[0,2),\ E_2=(1,3]##. Let ##\rho = 2X_{E_1} + 3X_{E_2}##. Draw a careful graph of that. You will see it takes on 3 different values, on the intervals ##[0,1],\ (1,2),\ [2,3]##. The canonical representation uses these three disjoint sets, each on which the function is a different constant.
 


Thanks, guys! That clarifies it.

Now could you explain to me what a Borel set is? My book doesn't say what a Borel set is ... it only gives a definition of the a collection of Borel sets:

"The collection β of Borel sets is the smallest σ-algebra which contains all of the open sets."

(Okay ... But what is a Borel set itself?)
 
Jamin2112 said:
... But what is a Borel set itself?)

It's any set in "the smallest σ-algebra which contains all of the open sets" :wink:

in other words, it's as defined at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borel_set
In mathematics, a Borel set is any set in a topological space that can be formed from open sets (or, equivalently, from closed sets) through the operations of countable union, countable intersection, and relative complement.​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K