Running older induction motors on VFDs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guineafowl
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

SUMMARY

Older induction motors not designed for inverter use suffer insulation damage from the high dv/dt voltage spikes generated by variable frequency drives (VFDs). The reflected wave phenomenon caused by impedance mismatch in long cables exacerbates voltage transients, but this is mainly a concern for cable lengths over 15 meters. Practical mitigation includes adding series inductors (line chokes) at the VFD output and a delta configuration of pulse-rated capacitors at the motor terminals to form an LC filter that limits dv/dt without dissipating energy. Adjusting the VFD carrier frequency and keeping cable lengths short further reduces stress on motor insulation. Inverter-duty motors have upgraded insulation to withstand these effects, unlike older motors commonly used in hobby workshops.

PREREQUISITES

  • Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) carrier frequency adjustment
  • LC filter design for dv/dt reduction (inductors and pulse-rated capacitors)
  • Understanding of reflected wave phenomena and impedance mismatch in motor cables
  • Motor power factor correction using delta capacitor banks

NEXT STEPS

  • Measure and select appropriate inductance values (e.g., ~5mH) and capacitance (~0.47µF) for LC filters
  • Use an oscilloscope with suitable probes to analyze VFD output waveforms and detect voltage spikes
  • Research and implement reflected wave traps for cable lengths exceeding 15 meters
  • Investigate motor noise sources such as magnetostriction and winding vibration related to VFD switching frequencies

USEFUL FOR

Hobbyists and workshop technicians running older three-phase induction motors on single-phase supplies via VFDs, electrical engineers designing motor protection circuits, and anyone maintaining legacy motors without inverter-duty insulation looking to extend motor life and reduce insulation failure risk.

Guineafowl
Messages
921
Reaction score
420
TL;DR
What cheap and practical steps could a hobby workshop take to limit the damage caused by VFDs to old motors not designed for them?
The ‘spiky’ output of variable frequency drives (VFDs) can damage the insulation of older motors. They’re often used to run three phase motors on single-phase supplies in hobby workshops. (Modern motors have upgraded insulation and are designated ‘inverter-duty’.) I wonder what cheap and practical steps one can take to mitigate this, given that dedicated sine wave filters are quite expensive. I think most of us quietly ignore the problem and hope for the best.

Apparently, the motor windings themselves act as quite good low-pass filters for the current, and that it’s actually the voltage rise time that causes the problem. The high dv/dt pulses result in reflected waves sloshing back and forth due to impedance mismatch. These waves add together in the cable between VFD and motor, leading to high voltage transients that damage old motor insulation.

^^ I’m sure this is a poor summary, and also sure that you could write a whole monograph on the subject. But, down to brass tacks, what practical steps could we take in a hobby workshop with several old motors on VFDs?

1. In-line chokes, such as old fluorescent light ballasts, providing they could take the rated current?

2. Keep the VFD-motor cable short, and manipulate the VFD’s carrier frequency based on this length?

3. MOVs, or something, to clip the transients? I looked into the surge protection devices (SPDs) now becoming more readily available because they’re mentioned in the new UK domestic mains wiring regulations, but they are apparently not sensitive enough.

4. Some sort of snubber network at the motor terminals?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Guineafowl said:
TL;DR: What cheap and practical steps could a hobby workshop take to limit the damage caused by VFDs to old motors not designed for them?

4. Some sort of snubber network at the motor terminals?
Not at the motor terminals, but at the inverter output. The voltage switching outputs need to see an inductive load. Wind three inductors on separate ferrite cores, one for each line, then couple them to a delta of pulse rated capacitors, giving three lines with limited dv/dt. A good VFD should have that circuit in its output to reduce radiated EMI.

You could also neutralise the motor power factor with a delta of capacitors at the motor terminals. That would be OK for fixed frequency operation, but difficult if you used a wide range of VFD frequencies.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and Guineafowl
Baluncore said:
Not at the motor terminals, but at the inverter output. The voltage switching outputs need to see an inductive load. Wind three inductors on separate ferrite cores, one for each line, then couple them to a delta of pulse rated capacitors, giving three lines with limited dv/dt. A good VFD should have that circuit in its output to reduce radiated EMI.

You could also neutralise the motor power factor with a delta of capacitors at the motor terminals. That would be OK for fixed frequency operation, but difficult if you used a wide range of VFD frequencies.
So this would be a dv/dt, or perhaps LC filter, rather than a snubber?

image.webp


What sort of values would work? Elsewhere it’s been suggested 5mH and 0.47uF. I’ll need a meter that measures inductance, unless I can just buy suitable inductors. I don’t mind spending a bit, since they’d be protecting essentially irreplaceable motors.

The carrier frequency of one of my VFDs can be adjusted from 1-15 kHz, default 3 kHz, if that’s relevant.

How would correcting the motor pf (which you helped me with before) deal with VFD voltage spikes?
 
Last edited:
Guineafowl said:
So this would be a dv/dt, or perhaps LC filter, rather than a snubber?
Snubbers in this case would be RC networks that make the output look like a low resistance at high frequencies. That will attenuate the pulse on the line. The LC circuit does not waste energy in a resistor.
Guineafowl said:
I don’t mind spending a bit, since they’d be protecting essentially irreplaceable motors.
Did you look at the lines with an oscilloscope? How do you know there is a problem, or is this just a fear?
Guineafowl said:
How would correcting the motor pf (which you helped me with before) deal with VFD voltage spikes?
It would better isolate the motor inductance from the VFD. Correctly chosen capacitors across the motor will limit dv/dt, and reduce circulating current between the motor and VFD, that might otherwise saturate the VFD output chokes.
 
Baluncore said:
Did you look at the lines with an oscilloscope? How do you know there is a problem, or is this just a fear?
I have a couple of old CROs, but not the right probes for connecting up. The VFD/old motor problem is described here: https://www.mtecorp.com/wp-content/uploads/SP-006-E_Web.pdf
Also, when buying new motors, they are often specified as ‘inverter-ready’ as mentioned above, implying that older ones are not.
 
If you can hear a buzz when a motor runs on a VFD, then that vibration may chafe the field coil insulation. The buzz is the sound of the higher harmonics that are not being attenuated by the VFD output LPF.
Any voltage spikes from the VFD will be due to there being insufficient LPF at the VFD output.
 
Baluncore said:
If you can hear a buzz when a motor runs on a VFD, then that vibration may chafe the field coil insulation. The buzz is the sound of the higher harmonics that are not being attenuated by the VFD output LPF.
Any voltage spikes from the VFD will be due to there being insufficient LPF at the VFD output.
I can hear the 3 kHz switching frequency, yes.

https://industrialmonitordirect.com...-reflected-wave-trap-for-vfd-motor-protection
This link suggests the reflected waves (would it be a kind of SWR?) are significant only when the cable length exceeds 15m, so likely not a problem for the hobby shop.

For the chokes, would it be acceptable to use something like this:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B008IGQQFG/ref=sspa_dk_detail_4
Perhaps a bit bigger, with the ordinary single insulated wires supplying the motor wrapped as many times as possible?
 
Guineafowl said:
Perhaps a bit bigger, with the ordinary single insulated wires supplying the motor wrapped as many times as possible?
Definitely bigger, but too many turns will saturate the core.
What is peak motor current? You need a core datasheet.
The aim is to add series inductance to the motor windings, to reduce high frequency voltage appearing across motor terminals. Place a delta of capacitors across the motor terminals to keep HF voltage away from the motor.

Guineafowl said:
I can hear the 3 kHz switching frequency, yes.
Is the noise due to movement of windings or magnetostriction of the core?
 
There are several motors that might need this modification, one being a Newman ‘Elf’ from 1961, for which I can’t find a datasheet. It’s a very heavy cast-iron motor.
Its plate says 1.8 A/phase, permanent star, 415V, but I’ve extracted the star point to enable delta 240V, so I’d estimate 3.1 A/phase.

I’m not sure where the sound is coming from. I’d guess the windings, since they’re more mobile than the core, unless the core has started to delaminate.
 
  • #10
Have you considered flooding the field windings with epoxy resin to prevent movement ?
 
  • #11
No, because the sound isn’t a problem - it’s not annoying - and happens on even the newer motors. On some battery drills, when you just depress the trigger so you can hear the carrier frequency ‘sing’, before the mechanism starts moving and drowns out the noise. It’s that sort of sound.

It’s more what the sound represents. The fundamental of the VFD output is 50 Hz (10-100 Hz in the case of my milling machines, to achieve variable speed), but the PWM means harmonics, and its these that apparently damage motor insulation.

I was leaning towards an RC snubber at the motor terminals, because I probably have the components already, and none of them have to take the full motor current. This means I should be able to make the same snubber for all motors that need it.

In either the RC or LC case, I wondered if the capacitors should be X2 rated, since they’re across the mains, and should be designed for this?
 
  • #12
Guineafowl said:
The fundamental of the VFD output is 50 Hz (10-100 Hz in the case of my milling machines, to achieve variable speed), but the PWM means harmonics, and its these that apparently damage motor insulation.
That is why I suggest fixing the position of the windings, so they are not vibrated and chaffed by the harmonics.

A snubber would reduce dv/dt of the voltage spikes. What circuit would you use for snubbers?
 
  • #13
Something like this?:
image.webp


I’m not sure if the star point of the snubber should be earthed; all circuits in my shop are RCD-protected to 30mA so I’d like to avoid earth leakage.

I’m also not sure of values, but assume that they’re not so critical, because of the wide gap between desired (<=100 Hz) and undesired (>3 kHz) frequencies.
 
  • #14
If possible connect the Y of snubbers mid-point to the neutral, avoid a ground connection. If no neutral, design delta a snubbers, or leave the centre floating.
Do you have a circuit for the output of the VFD? I would expect an LC low-pass filter. If possible open the VFD and take a look at that filter. Measure the inductance and capacitance used.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Guineafowl and DaveE
  • #15
Baluncore said:
If possible connect the Y of snubbers mid-point to the neutral, avoid a ground connection. If no neutral, design delta a snubbers, or leave the centre floating.
Do you have a circuit for the output of the VFD? I would expect an LC low-pass filter. If possible open the VFD and take a look at that filter. Measure the inductance and capacitance used.
No circuit diagram, even in the manual for the decent VFD. At some point, I’ll get around to dismantling one of them as you suggest, but I have to assume the filtering in these devices isn’t adequate to protect older motor insulation, given the literature on the damage they cause.

I have a small box of X2 capacitors, rated for 310 Vac and 0.47 uF, which I used to fit into vintage valve (tube) radios when restoring them.

Starting with this 0.47 uF value, and a -3 dB cutoff frequency of 2 kHz, the Digikey RC filter calculator (https://www.digikey.co.uk/en/resour...sion-calculator-low-pass-and-high-pass-filter) suggests a resistor value of 169 ohm. No comment on the power rating - would it be of the order 1, 10 or 100W?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K