Rutherford Scattering Problem.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving Rutherford scattering, specifically focusing on an alpha particle interacting with a gold nucleus. Participants are tasked with calculating the kinetic energy of the alpha particle, the electric potential at a certain distance from the nucleus, and the closest distance of approach during the scattering event.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of kinetic energy and potential energy, with some expressing uncertainty about the problem's requirements. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of the potential at a distance from a point charge and the relationship between kinetic and potential energy at the closest approach.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the correctness of the kinetic energy calculation. Others are attempting to clarify the potential energy concepts and the conditions under which the closest distance of approach is determined. There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables involved, with some guidance provided on using Coulomb's law and potential energy equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the initial conditions of the problem, particularly the starting position of the alpha particle and how it relates to the potential energy calculations. There is also mention of textbook references that may have contributed to misunderstandings about the formulas being applied.

Cilabitaon
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In an experiment, an alpha particle of mass 6.7e-27 kg; charge 3.2e-19C travels in a straight line with a speed 2.0e7m/s towards the centre of a gold nucleus.

Find:
1. The kinetic energy(KE) of the alpha particle;
2. The potential(V) at a distance 'x' from the centre of the gold nucleus(of charge 1.3e-17C)
3. The closest distance of approach, and prove that it is 2.8e-14m

Homework Equations


KE=\frac{mv^{2}}{2}
E=\frac{F}{Q}
E=\frac{V}{x}

The Attempt at a Solution


1. KE=\frac{mv^{2}}{2} = \frac{1}{2}·{(6.7*10^{-27}) · (2*10^{7})^{2}} = _1.34*10^{-12}J
This part I'm pretty sure of, and I know I should be doing these in my sleep by now, but it was 3:00am when I did this and haven't checked any of these much.

2. E=F/Q and E=V/x

F/Q=V/x -> V=(Fx)/Q

I really had no idea what I was being asked here; yes I realize it tells me clear-as-day, but I just can't seem to get anywhere with this question.

2. I really didn't have a clue. I have tried so many approaches with each being as tame as the last: I first tried initial KE = final PE, to no avail; but that may just be since every time I go over the question I end up answering it in the same WRONG way.

Sorry, I'm not asking anyone to do my homework for me, but I just feel like I'm missing that little piece of info I happened to overlook.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For question 1, your result for the KE of the alpha particle is correct.

Question 2. is about the potential of the gold nucleus. It is considered a point charge of 1.3e-17C. What is the potential at a distance x from a point charge of q?

Question 3 is not a question. Are you sure you copied the problem well? Maybe, you are to find the original distance of the particle from the nucleus.


ehild
 
I still don't get the question, the point charge q has a value, so am I expected to put that into a formula with potential(V) and distance (x): where all I'd get is (Wx/q)=V

Question 3 is trying to get me to use current data to find the closest distance of approach, but the question tells me what it is just so I can say "yeah, I'm right/wrong" when I get to the final answer.
 
You can find the distance of closest approach if you know the initial position of the particle. Maybe it was meant that the particle started from very far, practically infinity. Or it is asked from where the particle had started, so as the closest approach is at the given distance.

Try to assume that the particle has that 1.34e-12 J KE at infinity. At the closest approach, the KE is converted to potential energy. What is the potential energy when the alpha particle is at a distance x from the gold nucleus? You need to use the Coulomb potential.

ehild
 
So I need V=\frac{Qq}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}?

But then that would make Q my Au nucleus and my point charge the alpha particle, correct?

Also, I change r^{2} for x^{2}, don't I?

Thanks a lot for this help by the way; it's much appreciated.
 
That is the Coulomb force, not the potential energy!
Yes, r or x is the distance between the nucleus and the alpha particle. And Q is the charge of the gold nucleus and q is that of the alpha particle.

ehild
 
ehild said:
That is the Coulomb force, not the potential energy!
Yes, r or x is the distance between the nucleus and the alpha particle. And Q is the charge of the gold nucleus and q is that of the alpha particle.

ehild

Sorry, I was quoting from my A2 textbook and it states:
Force between two point charges;
F=\frac{Q_{1}Q_{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}

and

electric potential;
V=\frac{W}{Q}
V=\frac{Qq}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}

Should the latter not have r, not r^{2}?

I still don't know the potential at any point, or the distance, so how can potential energy changes be used?
 
I've just thought, with the equation V=\frac{W}{Q} I can find V for the \alpha particle.

W=1.34*10^{-12}J

V=\frac{1.34*10^{-12}}{3.2*10^{-19}} = 4.1875*10^{6}JC^{-1}
 
The potential around a point charge Q is

<br /> V=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r}<br />

What you cited V=W/Q means the definition of the potential: It is the work done by the electric field on unit positive charge when it moves from the given point to infinite, or to a position where the potential is zero. The potential energy of a charge q is Vq.
So, find the distance from the nucleus, where the potential is

<br /> V= 4.1875*10^{6}JC^{-1}<br />

ehild
 
  • #10
Thanks a lot!

This does give me confidence, but now I'm wondering; isn't this the potential of the \alpha that we have both just found?

edit:

Oh my goodness, I do believe I am an idiot :)

Thanks so much, I've just realized I've been making the same problems for myself every time I go through this, and now it's just become clear that it wasn't a problem at all!

V = \frac{Q}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}r}

r = \frac{Q}{V \cdot 4 \pi \epsilon_{0}}

r = \frac{1.3 \times 10^{-17}}{(4.1875 \times 10^{6}) \times 4 \pi \times (8.85 \times 10^{-12})}

r = 2.79 \times 10^{-14}m

*problem solved* ;)
 
Last edited:
  • #11
At last :smile:

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K