S is set of all vectors of form (x,y,z) such that x=y or x =z. Basis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The set S consists of all vectors of the form (x,y,z) where either x=y or x=z. It has been established that S cannot have a basis due to its failure to meet the criteria of a vector subspace. Specifically, the vectors (x,x,z) and (x,y,x) can be expressed as linear combinations of the basis sets A = {(1,1,0), (0,0,1)} and A' = {(1,0,1), (0,1,0)}, but their union exceeds the linear span of S. Therefore, S does not possess a basis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with linear combinations and basis vectors
  • Knowledge of vector notation and operations
  • Basic proof techniques in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of vector subspaces in linear algebra
  • Study the concept of linear independence and dependence
  • Learn about the criteria for a set of vectors to form a basis
  • Explore examples of non-subspace sets in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to vector spaces and bases.

Hall
Messages
351
Reaction score
87
##S## is a set of all vectors of form ##(x,y,z)## such that ##x=y## or ##x=z##. Can ##S## have a basis?

S contains either ##(x,x,z)## type of elements or ##(x,y,x)## type of elements.

Case 1: ## (x,x,z)= x(1,1,0)+z(0,0,1)##
Hencr, the basis for case 1 is ##A = \{(1,1,0), (0,0,1)##\}

And similarly for case 2 the basis would be ##A'= \{ (1,0,1), (0,1,0)\} ##.

But how to find the basis for ##S##? A union of A and A' would give us a set whose linear span would go beyond S and hence cannot be a basis for S. Can S have a basis? How do we find it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

Perhaps you should check whether ##S## is a vector (sub-) space?
 
PeroK said:
:welcome:

Perhaps you should check whether ##S## is a vector (sub-) space?
##(x,x,z)##, ##(x,y,x)## ##\in S##

## (2x, x+y, x+z)## is not in S. S is not a subspace.

Oh yes, thanks.
 
I think that's 95% of a proof, but if you want to be very technical, you should prove the thing you wrote down isn't actually of the form (x'x',z') or (x',y',x'). This is typically done by actually picking specific x,y,z and observing that it doesn't work.

Also, in case you didn't realize, you didn't actually pick generic elements of S, since you forced x to be the same in both of them. In some cases you could get unlucky and trick yourself into thinking it is a subspace doing this (obviously it works out ok here)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Infrared
Office_Shredder said:
I think that's 95% of a proof, but if you want to be very technical, you should prove the thing you wrote down isn't actually of the form (x'x',z') or (x',y',x'). This is typically done by actually picking specific x,y,z and observing that it doesn't work.

Also, in case you didn't realize, you didn't actually pick generic elements of S, since you forced x to be the same in both of them. In some cases you could get unlucky and trick yourself into thinking it is a subspace doing this (obviously it works out ok here)
Well, the 2nd paragraph is really pedantic. Thanks.
 
Hall said:
Well, the 2nd paragraph is really pedantic.
On the contrary, I think @Office_Shredder makes a cogent point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Infrared

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K