S&P downgrade Monday 8/8/11 US market poll

  • Thread starter Thread starter moejoe15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poll
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential impact of the S&P downgrade on the US stock market, specifically addressing concerns about a possible market downturn on August 8, 2011. Participants explore various viewpoints regarding the implications of the downgrade, market reactions, and investment strategies in light of economic conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the severity of the downgrade's impact, suggesting that the worst may be over and attributing greater concern to issues like Italy and political factors rather than US debt itself.
  • Others argue that the downgrade reflects significant underlying problems, including a lack of fiscal discipline and the potential for long-term economic drag due to high debt levels.
  • Several participants advocate for holding or buying stocks, citing historical trends that suggest markets recover over time and emphasizing the importance of sticking to asset allocation strategies.
  • There are differing views on whether the downgrade was anticipated by the market, with some suggesting that it was already priced in, while others believe it could lead to volatility.
  • Participants discuss the relationship between debt downgrades and stock prices, with some referencing classical economic theory that suggests stock prices should rise in response to increased risk in debt investments.
  • Concerns are raised about the potential for a double-dip recession and how that might affect market perceptions and investment decisions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views regarding the implications of the S&P downgrade, with no clear consensus on whether it will lead to a market downturn or if the situation is manageable. Participants express a range of opinions on investment strategies and the broader economic context.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various economic indicators and historical performance without reaching a definitive conclusion about the future market trajectory. There is uncertainty regarding the immediate effects of the downgrade and the interplay of various economic factors.

Who May Find This Useful

Investors, financial analysts, and individuals interested in market trends and economic discussions may find this thread relevant as it explores diverse perspectives on the implications of credit ratings and stock market behavior.

What are you going to do first thing Monday 8/8/11 when the US stock market opens?

  • Bail out and sell everything?

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hold your stocks?

    Votes: 14 82.4%
  • Buy stocks?

    Votes: 3 17.6%

  • Total voters
    17
  • Poll closed .
moejoe15
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Is black Monday coming? What are you going to do with your stocks Monday 8/8/11?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moejoe15 said:
Is black Monday coming? What are you going to do with your stocks Monday 8/8/11?

I feel anyone seriously in the stock market casino either knew this was coming for months or knew that regardless of the rating that the US was in trouble. With that said, I don't know :)
 
moejoe15 said:
Is black Monday coming?

No. The worst is over; at least for now.

If all three major credit rating agencies had particpated in the downgrade, or even if Moodys had followed suit, we would almost certainly be facing another crisis. But given that it was only S&P, and given thay they made a $2 trillion math error, I don't see this being a big problem at the moment.

The real problems have been Italy, and the tea party, not US debt.
 
Last edited:
The tea party? You mean you don't believe Fox blaming Obama who would have routinely raised the debt ceiling if he could have?
 
moejoe15 said:
The tea party? You mean you don't believe Fox blaming Obama who would have routinely raised the debt ceiling if he could have?

S&P was specific about this. The failure to automatically [as has always been done] raise the debt ceiling was one of the main reasons for the downgrade. That we would even threaten to default, [let alone by choice!] was enough to shake confidence.

S&P isn't even worried about our short-term debt. In spite of the nonsense from the right, now is not the time for draconian cuts in spending. We need to allow more time for economic recovery to take hold. But we also need to damp the trajectory of our debt over the next ten years. That is what S&P wants to see.

They also want to see the Bush tax cuts expire.
 
Last edited:
Selling out of what you own now would be the worst idea possible! (in my humble opinion) If you have the ability to buy more of what you already own - and if you purchased what you have under some sort of appropriate asset allocation model - then buy more. But... i hate to see people get the gambling fever and start making decisions when things get really good or really bad.

It's been proven that the average person who sticks to their initial asset allocation strategy in a retirement plan typically outperforms someone who changes strategies frequently.

I'm not happy about the downgrade, but i think it's a good thing since it's bringing a real valuation to our economy.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
No. The worst is over; at least for now.

If all three major credit rating agencies had particpated in the downgrade, or even if Moodys had followed suit, we would almost certainly be facing another crisis. But given that it was only S&P, and given thay they made a $2 trillion math error, I don't see this being a big problem at the moment.

The real problems have been Italy, and the tea party, not US debt.

You don't think U.S. debt is a problem? We're running six wars on credit, we have a $14T debt, and $60T+ in unfunded liabilities for social programs. How is this going to end well?
 
Apparently the markets have expected a downgrade. There was a partial recovery on Friday. I would expect some bargain hunters on Monday, and perhaps some trading programs will kick in. If one is considering buying stock, then look over the last 5 years or so, look at the earnings per share (and ROI) and the dividends. Dividends > 3% look good compared to treasuries and savings accounts at the moment.

Also, look the Asian markets tonight as they open on Monday morning there, and then look at the EU markets before the opening of the US markets.

Expect some volatility in the near term.
 
  • #10
I would tend to agree with QuantumCandy. While everyone's financial situation and goals are different, holding now and even buying more would be a wise idea.
 
  • #11
Insanity said:
I would tend to agree with QuantumCandy. While everyone's financial situation and goals are different, holding now and even buying more would be a wise idea.
If you don't need to cash out in the near future (10 years or so, IMO) that's probably good advice.
 
  • #12
turbo said:
If you don't need to cash out in the near future (10 years or so, IMO) that's probably good advice.

Agreed, history performance shows that every 10 year block, almost without exception, the market goes up. The last 70 years or so, after every bear market, the following bull market goes longer and returns everything that was lost and more, sometimes many times more.
 
  • #14
Astronuc said:
Imagine if one had bought GE stock at $7.00 per share during the week of March 2, 2009.
Double-up in 2 years? I'd like that.
 
  • #15
If you haven't taken any action already, there is no sense taking any now, because everything that is already known about the situation is already built into the price the market will open on Monday.

On the other hand, if you had the foresight to move your life savings from USD into Swss Francs a year ago, you would have doubled your money in a year, even before last weeks diversions. And that's without using any financial instruments more complicated than keeping some Swiss banknotes under your mattress.

But IMO many US residents seem to struggle the idea that anything other than a US dollar is really "money" at all :smile:
 
  • #16
turbo said:
Double-up in 2 years? I'd like that.
Also, consider the current dividend - and look a Warren Buffet's warrants.
 
  • #17
Astronuc said:
Also, consider the current dividend - and look a Warren Buffet's warrants.
Yep. 3.6% is a pretty nice yield. I wish I could get half of that on my savings.
 
  • #18
First, whether there will be a market correction (in either direction) assumes that the downgrade was not correctly priced into begin with. I can't believe that this was a surprise to anyone - there were explicit warnings, after all.

That said, classical economic theory says stock prices should move up in response to a debt downgrade, not down.
 
  • #19
Vanadium 50 said:
That said, classical economic theory says stock prices should move up in response to a debt downgrade, not down.
Eh? The theory being that money would flow out of debt into equities? Even so, I can imagine some counter arguments to equity prices going up.
 
  • #20
Right. The short answer is that as the risk of one investment increases, other investments become more attractive. A longer answer is that to compensate for the increased risk, rates have to go up, which means prices go down, and bond and stock prices are inversely correlated.
 
  • #21
Asian makets: Nikkei 225, Hang Seng, Straits Times are all down Monday morning. So watch what happens the rest of the day.
 
  • #22
moejoe15 said:
Is black Monday coming? What are you going to do with your stocks Monday 8/8/11?
I meant to buy some stock on Fri afternoon, but was thwarted by what I think was a software bug. Glad I didn't, but I'll be placing an order for tomorrow when I get home tonight.
 
  • #23
Vanadium 50 said:
Right. The short answer is that as the risk of one investment increases, other investments become more attractive.
Last week, despite all the talk about the debt being a problem, the money went in the wrong direction for debt to be the perceived problem, based on that conventional wisdom. IMO, that doesn't necessarily mean bonds got more attractive, but rather that stocks got more less attractive. And I think the reason is that debt isn't a self-contained problem, affecting only bondholders; it is a long-term drag on the economy that people are only now starting to take seriously.

...However, it is also possible that the debt talk merely came in second to a larger concern about a double-dip recession.
 
  • #24
Dow is down over 300 points already. Almost every index is down over 4%...
 
  • #25
Hold the stocks that one didn't sell two weeks ago, and buy stocks that have dropped ~10%, or wait to see if they fall a bit more.
 
  • #26
I'll wait a few days and buy some stocks once I think the market won't dip any further. Dow's now below 11,000 points and doesn't look like it will be stopping today.
 
  • #27
That was about twice as bad as I expected. "Jitters" is the only thing that seems to make any sense. It looked like it might rebound to about a 300 point loss but dropped again at the very end of the day.

I would change my vote to a "buy" now.
 
  • #28
If you are in the moving roller coaster, the safest thing to do is to stay there, not jumping in and out.
 
  • #29
jobyts said:
If you are in the moving roller coaster, the safest thing to do is to stay there, not jumping in and out.

We just keep buying our mutual funds. IMO, either you make investing a full time job and become an expert, or you leave it to the experts. I've thought about trying my hand as a day trader but can't even begin to justify the time for the learning curve.

I don't have many regrest in life but when I heard a story about Warren Buffet, I felt a twinge of regret. By the time he was sixteen or so, he had read every book they had about economics, at his local library. Now why didn't I think of that?
 
  • #30
To all who are following this thread, as I have just posted in my https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3442270&postcount=73". I will make it simple for you. Some stocks may NEVER recover to their former values, Raytheon comes to mind immediately. Explain to me how if the stock loses 60% or more in 1998 of it's value and then 13 years later it it is still worth 40% less than it was in say 1998, how that it a good thing ? You have lost your principal FOREVER. You will never make it back up. As I stated I my thread even 10 years out from retirement, I cannot afford to take the chance, because of the scenario I just laid out for you.

My big problem, is if the market starts to come back, do I buy while it is still near the bottom and risk it never coming back to the price I sold it at ? Not an easy call for sure. Myself and at least a dozen co-workers are so glad we did dump all of it about two weeks ago.

Rhody...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K