S-wave phase shift for quantum mechanical scattering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the S-wave phase shift for quantum mechanical scattering from a delta function potential, specifically defined as ##V(r) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2\mu} \gamma \delta(r-a)##. Participants explore various approaches to derive the phase shift equation, particularly the relation $$\tan(ka + \delta_0) = \frac{\tan ka}{1 + \left(\frac{\gamma}{k}\right) \tan ka}$$. The total cross-section for S-wave scattering is also evaluated, yielding the formula $$\sigma \cong 4\pi a^2 \left(\frac{\gamma a}{1+\gamma a}\right)^2$$ in the low-energy limit. Key challenges include applying boundary conditions and matching wavefunctions at the delta function potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, particularly scattering theory
  • Familiarity with Dirac delta functions in potential energy contexts
  • Knowledge of wavefunction matching techniques in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in solving differential equations related to quantum states
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of phase shifts in quantum scattering, focusing on delta function potentials
  • Learn about the implications of boundary conditions on wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the mathematical techniques for evaluating total cross-sections in scattering problems
  • Investigate the role of the low-energy limit in quantum scattering scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers focusing on scattering theory and potential energy models will benefit from this discussion.

EightBells
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Consider the spherically symmetric potential energy $$\frac {2\mu V\left( r \right)} {\hbar^2} = \gamma \delta \left(r-a \right)$$ where ##\gamma## is a constant and ##\delta \left( r-a \right)## is a Dirac delta function that vanishes everywhere except on the spherical surface specified by ##r=a##.
a.) Show that the S-wave phase shift ##\delta_0## for scattering from this potential satisfies the equation $$\tan \left( ka + \delta_0 \right) = \frac {\tan ka} {1+\left( \frac \gamma k \right) \tan ka}$$
b.) Evaluate the phase shift in the low-energy limit and show that the total cross section for S-wave scattering is $$ \sigma \cong 4\pi a^2 \left( \frac {\gamma a} {1+\gamma a} \right)^2$$
Relevant Equations
$$\tan \left( ka + \delta_0 \right) = \frac {\tan ka} {1+\left( \frac \gamma k \right) \tan ka}$$
$$k = \sqrt{\frac {2mE} {\hbar^2}}$$
a.) The potential is a delta function, so ##V \left( r \right) = \frac {\hbar^2} {2\mu} \gamma \delta \left(r-a \right)##, therefore ##V \left( r \right) = \frac {\hbar^2} {2\mu} \gamma ## at ##r=a##, and ##V \left( r \right) = 0## otherwise. I've tried a few different approaches:

1.) In examples of hard sphere scattering which are easy to find online, the equation ##\frac {-\hbar^2} {2m} \frac {d^2 u \left(r \right)} {dr^2} = Eu\left( r \right)## is used for outside the hard sphere, ##r \gt a##. I'm not sure how this would apply to a delta function potential however, so I got stuck using this approach.

2.)I found that for a spherically symmetric potential, the incoming and outgoing waves would accumulate the phase difference ##e^{i\delta_l}##. So for ##\Psi_1 = Ae^{ikr}+Be^{-ikr}## describing the left side of the potential (##r \lt a##) and ##\Psi_2 = Ce^{ikr}##, I could try to use the boundary conditions (not sure what they would be though, maybe ##\Psi_1 \left(a \right) = \Psi_2 \left( a \right)## and ##\Psi_1' \left( a \right) = \Psi_2' \left( a \right)## ?) to solve for the phase difference by looking at the ratio of coefficients, maybe ##A/B## or ##A/C##?

3.) I also found an equation ##a_l \left(k \right) = \frac {e^{i\delta_l}} k \sin \delta_l ## where ##a_l \left(k \right)## is a coefficient that depends on the value of the energy. I'm not sure how to determine that coefficient, so this was a dead end too.

b.) I've seen the equation ##\sigma = \frac {4\pi} {k^2} \sin^2 \delta_0##, so if this is the right equation I could just plug in ##\delta_0## once I've found it in part a, and check that it matches the solution given in the problem? Does this address the low-energy limit as specified in the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
EightBells said:
1.) In examples of hard sphere scattering which are easy to find online, the equation ##\frac {-\hbar^2} {2m} \frac {d^2 u \left(r \right)} {dr^2} = Eu\left( r \right)## is used for outside the hard sphere, ##r \gt a##. I'm not sure how this would apply to a delta function potential however, so I got stuck using this approach.
This is the right approach.

What would be the solution ##u(r)## if there was no potential? What do you expect to find for ##u(r \gg a)##?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nrqed
EightBells said:
Homework Statement:: Consider the spherically symmetric potential energy $$\frac {2\mu V\left( r \right)} {\hbar^2} = \gamma \delta \left(r-a \right)$$ where ##\gamma## is a constant and ##\delta \left( r-a \right)## is a Dirac delta function that vanishes everywhere except on the spherical surface specified by ##r=a##.
a.) Show that the S-wave phase shift ##\delta_0## for scattering from this potential satisfies the equation $$\tan \left( ka + \delta_0 \right) = \frac {\tan ka} {1+\left( \frac \gamma k \right) \tan ka}$$
b.) Evaluate the phase shift in the low-energy limit and show that the total cross section for S-wave scattering is $$ \sigma \cong 4\pi a^2 \left( \frac {\gamma a} {1+\gamma a} \right)^2$$
Relevant Equations:: $$\tan \left( ka + \delta_0 \right) = \frac {\tan ka} {1+\left( \frac \gamma k \right) \tan ka}$$
$$k = \sqrt{\frac {2mE} {\hbar^2}}$$

a.) The potential is a delta function, so ##V \left( r \right) = \frac {\hbar^2} {2\mu} \gamma \delta \left(r-a \right)##, therefore ##V \left( r \right) = \frac {\hbar^2} {2\mu} \gamma ## at ##r=a##, and ##V \left( r \right) = 0## otherwise.
To add to DrClaude's useful hints, note that what you wrote in the last line is incorrect, ##V## is not ##\frac {\hbar^2} {2\mu} \gamma ## at ##r=a##. Have you worked with matching wavefunctions when there is a Dirac delta as boundary condition? The matching is different from usual for the derivative of the wavefunction.
Also, it looks like you think about wavefunctions on a real line (you talk about being on the `"right" or "left" of ##r=a##, here we are working along the radial direction, so you have to be careful about that, in particular the condition at ##r=0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
798
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K