Sad news for Earth in several billion years

  • Thread starter Thread starter Count Iblis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth News Years
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the long-term future of Earth and the implications of cosmic changes over several billion years, referencing an arXiv paper. Participants express varying perspectives on the significance of these changes and the human experience of time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference an arXiv paper discussing Earth's fate on a timescale of billions of years.
  • One participant suggests that the thread title could be more descriptive and emphasizes the need for content beyond just a link.
  • Another participant expresses a view that the transient nature of the universe is not inherently "sad" and reflects on the inevitability of change.
  • A different viewpoint suggests skepticism about humanity's long-term survival, indicating that concerns about the future may be premature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the emotional weight of the topic, with some finding it significant and others dismissing it as irrelevant. There is no consensus on the implications of the discussed changes.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about human longevity and the interpretation of cosmic events, which remain unresolved.

Count Iblis
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
8
http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.4031"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org


Count Iblis said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.4031"
... on the scale of several billion years.

Given the nature of this forum, it might be better to have a more descriptive thread title, and some actual text rather than a bare link.

PS. I don't expect to live forever; and I don't find that "sad". Neither do I think there's anything especially "sad" about the fact we live in a dynamic universe, where things change, and nothing lasts forever.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


sylas said:
... on the scale of several billion years.

Given the nature of this forum, it might be better to have a more descriptive thread title, and some actual text rather than a bare link.

I updated the thread title to reflect the content of the arXiv paper that Count is linking to.
 
Meh. We'll be lucky if we're even still here in 10,000 years, never mind several billion.
 

Similar threads

Earth's earliest forest discovered in SW England
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Super Typhoon Ragasa, strongest so far this year, 2025
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Study suggests Earth's hydrogen was enough for its water budget
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Coldest Place on Earth - in Antarctica, of course
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Rare earth mineral deposit, Brook Mine, near Sheridan, WY
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
How do we derive the Earth's yearly mean temperature?
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
The Earth's Climate Can Change Rapidly
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
The Oldest Rock on Earth?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Hiawatha impact crater in Greenland, formed ~58 million years ago
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Content of Earth-impacting meteors over time
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K