Sakurai proof Wigner-Eckart theorem

  • Thread starter detste
  • Start date
  • #1
1
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

On page 240 in Sakurai's book "Modern Quantum Mechanics" (Revised edition) you can find a proof of the Wigner-Eckart theorem. I don't understand how you can deduce equation (3.10.36) from equation (3.10.35). I also don't understand why this proportionality factor is independent of m, q and m'. Can someone clarify this?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
418
28
Well first of all, 3.10.36 follows from 3.10.35 because the recursion relation for the Tq(k) matrix elements is the same as the recursion relation for the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients.

The recursion relation for the CG coefficients gives us the ratio between any two CG coefficients. But there is nothing which dictates their absolute magnitudes (aside from an arbitrary convention). If the Tq(k) matrix elements are known to follow the same recursion relation, then we know the ratios between all of them, too, and these ratios are exactly the same as those between the CG coefficients. However, the absolute magnitude of these matrix elements is not dictated by the recursion relation, and the absolute magnitude need not be equal to that of the CG coefficient. Thus the only difference that can exist between the Tq(k) matrix elements and the CG coefficients is an overall scale factor (by overall I mean the same scale factor relates all Tq(k) matrix elements with their associated CG coefficient.)

Now since the CG coefficient recursion relation dictates all of the CG coefficients (not just for a given m, q, or m'), then this overall scale factor must not depend on m, q, or m'.
 

Related Threads for: Sakurai proof Wigner-Eckart theorem

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
304
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
949
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
6K
Top