Same string, different mass per unit length, whats the wavelength?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a string composed of two materials with different mass per unit lengths (mu), where the wavelength on one side is known and the task is to determine the wavelength on the other side. The context includes understanding the relationship between mass per unit length and wave properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between wavelength, wave speed, and mass per unit length, with some attempting to balance equations. Questions arise about the dependency of wave properties on mass per unit length and the implications of using the same string for both sides.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using the wave speed equation and the relationship between tension and mass per unit length. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity regarding the variables involved, and some participants express confusion about the setup and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of working with multiple unknowns and the potential for misunderstanding the relationship between tension, frequency, and wave properties. There is mention of homework constraints that may limit the information available for solving the problem.

bobbo7410
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Same string, different mass per unit length, what's the wavelength?

*oddly I can't edit the original title?

Homework Statement



A string is made of two materials of different mass per unit length. On the left side of the string, the mpu is given as well as its wavelength. On the right only the mpu. The question asks for the right side's wavelength.

Homework Equations



xxx

The Attempt at a Solution



I immediately began doing just a simple balancing equations. 2.76/20.4 = 3.63X

yet it returned the answer as incorrect. How can that be??

as well, I thought maybe it was trick question since its all the same single string, the wavelength must be the same. so I put 20.4 and as well it returned it as incorrect.

I'm really not sure what I did wrong.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the wavelength (or wave speed) depend on the mass per unit length?
 
Not sure if you were questioning me or you stating the problem variables don't depend on one another.

mu (mpl or mass per unit length) = string mass / string length

v = square root of (T / mu) where t = mg

thats all I can really find or think of regarding mu
 
bobbo7410 said:
v = square root of (T / mu) where t = mg
Good. The square root is key. That's what you were missing earlier.
 
? earlier all i had was a simply balanced equation that's it.

v = square root (T/mg) T being the period and mg being mass * gravity

I don't know T, or the mass.

perhaps you could break it down a little more basic for me.

Thanks for the help!
 
bobbo7410 said:
? earlier all i had was a simply balanced equation that's it.
Your balance equation was incorrect. Come up with a new one using the equation for wave speed.
v = square root (T/mg) T being the period and mg being mass * gravity
I thought we agreed that: v = square root (T/mu)
You don't need to know the tension, since it's the same for both sides of string.

Combine this with the "wave equation": v = f * wavelength. (Hint: The frequency is also the same for both sides.)
 
: ) thank you! that made it much simpler for me, I got it correct.

for some reason I looked back and the mu looked like mg.

So basically:

v = square root (T / mu)
v = f * wavelength

so [ f * wavelength = square root ( T / mu ) ]

I set the frequency to 1 for both so I only had 1 variable to determine. I solved for T on the left side of the string and once I found that I used that same T to determine the wavelength for the right side.

yey thanks doc
 
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=1597041#post1597041

for my first equation.. Would it be beneficial to use the same setup as above to solve for frequency or T?

because if I were to find either of those I could easily find the velocity. yet I think am back where I started (2 unknown variables) since I can't simply substitute 1 for the frequency in that problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
42K