Sanity check please -- Load cable swinging outward on a rotating crane

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the physics of load cables swinging outward on a rotating crane, utilizing the equation Fcp = -m*w^2*r. Participants analyze the relationship between variables, particularly how to express r1 and r2 in terms of other parameters. There is a debate about the relevance of certain variables, with a suggestion that one variable may not be necessary. The importance of understanding the radius of rotation, R, as the sum of r1 and r2 is emphasized. The conversation concludes with a confirmation of the calculations and a light-hearted acknowledgment of simplifying the equation.
Thickmax
Messages
31
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Please can my work be sanity checked? I think I'm on the right lines
Relevant Equations
See below
1624914062559.png
So I know

Fcp=-m*w^2*r

So from the equation -m*w^2*r=m*g*tan(theta)

r = r1+r2

so to rewrite

-m*(w^2)*(r1+r2)=m*g*tan(theta)
So
r1+r2=(m*g*tan(theta))/-m*(w^2)

r1=((m*g*tan(theta))/-m*(w^2)) - r2

Am I doing this nearly correct?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thickmax said:
Am I doing this nearly correct?
Yes, but one of your variables is not in the list of those allowed in the answer. Can you see a way to get rid of it?
 
Shouldn't ##r_2## be directly proportional to ##\omega^2##?
 
Lnewqban said:
Shouldn't ##r_2## be directly proportional to ##\omega^2##?
No the crane rotates around its base column, the radius of rotation is ##R=r_1+r_2## not just ##r_2##.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but one of your variables is not in the list of those allowed in the answer. Can you see a way to get rid of it?
I can indeed! m's are overrated! Thank you for the confirmation
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
785
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
720
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K