Satellite Orbiting Earth Energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the energy required to move a 962kg satellite from a circular orbit at 99km altitude to a higher circular orbit at 195km. The relevant equations used include the gravitational potential energy formula E = (-GMm)/2r and the change in energy formula ΔE = Ef - Ei. Participants identified errors in their calculations, specifically in the application of the 1/r terms and the division factor. The correct energy requirement, after adjustments, is confirmed to be approximately 858MJ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy equations
  • Familiarity with orbital mechanics concepts
  • Knowledge of the gravitational constant (G) and mass of the Earth (M)
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of gravitational potential energy equations
  • Study the principles of orbital mechanics and energy transfer
  • Learn about the implications of altitude changes on satellite energy requirements
  • Explore numerical methods for solving energy calculations in orbital dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and anyone involved in satellite design and orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

blackheart
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. A 962kg satellite orbits the Earth at a constant altitude of 99km. How much energy must be added to the system to move the satellite into a circular orbit with altitude 195km?

2. Homework Equations :

E = (-GMm)/2r
\Delta E = Ef - Ei

3. My work (which produced the wrong answer)...

Ei = (-GMEms)/(2(rE + 99000m))

Ef = (-GMEms)/(2r(E + 195000m))

\Delta E = ((-GMEms)/2)((1/rf)-(1/ri)

The answer needs to be in MJ. I got 858MJ which is incorrect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi blackheart. The method looks good. I got about half your answer.
Did you get 2.26 x 10^-9 for the difference between the 1/r terms?
 
Oh! I didn't divide by two... I have it now. Thanks a bunch.
 
Most welcome.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K