Undergrad Scalar powers of a matrix exponential

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the identity (e^A)^n = e^{nA} for a matrix A, starting from the definition of the matrix exponential as a power series. While it's established that this holds for integer n when A and B commute, the challenge lies in extending the proof to real n. Participants express confusion over defining (e^A)^n for non-integer values, suggesting that using the series definition is necessary. The conversation also touches on a scalar analog of the problem, with a proposal to prove (e^x)^n = e^{nx} using the power series definition of the exponential function. Overall, the thread highlights the complexities of extending matrix exponential properties to real powers.
Hiero
Messages
322
Reaction score
68
Starting from the definition of a matrix exponential as a power series, how would we show that ##(e^A)^n=e^{nA}##?

I know how to show that if A and B commute then ##e^Ae^B = e^{A+B}## and from this we can show that the first identity is true for integer values of n, but how can we show it’s true for any real value of n?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Define ##\left(e^A\right)^n## in case ##n\in \mathbb{R}.##
 
  • Like
Likes Hiero
fresh_42 said:
Define ##\left(e^A\right)^n## in case ##n\in \mathbb{R}.##
I was naively imagining the nth power of the infinite sum, but I suppose to define the nth power of a matrix in the first place we would have to use the series definition? So it’s just by definition?
 
I don't know what the the left hand side should be. It makes no sense. What is ##\begin{bmatrix}-1&3\\1&-5\end{bmatrix}^\pi\;?##
 
fresh_42 said:
I don't know what the the left hand side should be. It makes no sense. What is ##\begin{bmatrix}-1&3\\1&-5\end{bmatrix}^\pi\;?##
That’s what I mean, we would have to use the exponential to define it like ##e^{\pi log(\begin{bmatrix}-1&3\\1&-5\end{bmatrix}\;)}## making the “identity” a definition.

I was overlooking that point, thanks.
 
I’m still curious about the scalar analog of the question. I know it’s pointless but I’m just wondering if someone has a solution to the following because I haven’t a clue how to approach it:

Suppose we defined ##e^x## by its power series ##e^x=1+x+0.5x^2+...+\frac{x^n}{n!}+...## (where x is a scalar now not a matrix)

Starting from that definition, how would we prove that ##(e^x)^n=e^{nx}## for any real n?

I’m just curious; there ought to be a way. So if you smart people are bored, then that is my problem to you.
 
I would prove that ##e^x## is a solution of ##y'=y,y'(0)=1## which is obvious, and then show that ##e^{nx}## and ##(e^x)^n## both solve ##y'=ny, y'(0)=n##, and see if Picard Lindelöff applies for uniqueness.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K