Understanding Inertia Tensor Scaling in CAD Models - Explained

Click For Summary
When scaling a CAD model, the inertia tensor is affected by both the mass and the distribution of the material. If the model is scaled down to half its size, the mass decreases to one-eighth due to volume reduction, while the inertia tensor scales by the square of the scaling factor. The correct scaling factor for the inertia tensor is derived as I_half = (1/2)^2 * (1/8) * I_full, leading to a total scaling of 1/32 of the original inertia tensor. This relationship holds true under the assumption of constant density throughout the model. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate simulations and analyses in engineering applications.
alexanderBuzz
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I have the following problem in my hands, which I don't know how exactly to address.

Let's assume that from any CAD(Solidworks, Catia), I obtain the inertia tensor of my model (impossible to calculate by hand btw).

I_full=[Ixx Ixy Ixz
Ixy Iyy Iyz
Ixz Iyz Izz]

I know if I change the mass of my model, the inertia tensor will scale linearly with it.

But what If I scale my model to half-size, all dimensions? The mass probably goes by 1/8, since it's proportional to volume. Maybe the other factor would be 1/4 (α r^2).

So would the correct Inertia scaling factor be?:

I_half=1/4*1/8*I_full

Cheers!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
UltrafastPED said:
It must vary jointly with the mass and the distribution; for example consider how the simple inertia of a thick rod changes under your conditions: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi2.html
Thanks you!

It proves my derivation, if assumed constant density between the scaled object and full-size object.

by definition:

I=\int_V \rho r^2 dV

if r1-> ar ( scaled by a factor a) dV1->a^3dV

replacing on the above equation:
I1=\int_V \rho a^2 r^2 a^3 dV = a^5 \int_V \rho r^2 dV -> I1=a^5 I

again, assuming that the mass distribution remains constant.

Correct?
 
Last edited:
What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
73K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K