Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Scharnhorst effect - faster or slower than c?

  1. Oct 16, 2012 #1
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scharnhorst_effect

    I am confused.
    As wiki states "The time the photon's energy spends as subluminal electron-positron pairs lowers the observed speed of light in a vacuum"

    So light travels at c=1, spending some time in a form of subluminal electron-positron pairs with v<1. It makes an effective speed of light <1.

    Why wiki talks about FTL?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 16, 2012 #2
    I think the point is that the value of c we measure in vacuum already includes this effect, i.e., The value we measure and qoute is after this "slowing down". Now, when a photon travels between conducting plates, then the "slowing down" is smaller than in vacuum due to the absence of large wavelengths because of the boundry conditions. Therefore the photon's speed will be larger than the what we measure in vacuum.

    However, I'm not sure if what they claim is realy true
     
  4. Oct 16, 2012 #3
    Science News, 1990, cited in the Wikipedia says this:

    Seems that, in simple terms, they are saying 'if you slightly change the nature of space, that is it's vacuum energy, the speed of light will change slightly'....
    seems reasonable on the surface.

    In a separate physics letter cited by Wikipedia, it is concluded by different scientists that no measure of the faster than c velocity of light predicted by the Scharnhorst effect is possible.
     
  5. Oct 16, 2012 #4
    It is obvious that you can't measure it: plates (under tension because of Casimir effect) have weight, so light will be travelling in gravitation well, slower than c to external observer.

    Still, it is interesting...

    Another related question, what's about the magnitude of the same effect in a FALSE (dense) vacuum?
     
  6. Feb 26, 2014 #5
    I don't think they are saying that light will faster than c. They are actually saying that by changing vacuum permittivity and vacuum permeability, it is possible to change the speed of light, c itself!
     
  7. Feb 26, 2014 #6

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    That photon cannot move faster than c, can be derived from two assumptions:
    1) Photon mass is zero.
    2) Lorentz invariance

    In the Scharnhorst effect (and similarly in the effect studied in http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0301275 ) photon moves faster than c because it is assumption 2) which is violated. Namely, the plates define a preferred Lorentz frame (with respect to which the plates are at rest), the effect of which is that Lorentz invariance is violated.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Scharnhorst effect - faster or slower than c?
  1. Speed of light=c=c(f) (Replies: 5)

Loading...