Schrodinger equation for potential drop

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Schrödinger equation in a scenario involving a finite potential drop. The original poster is examining the behavior of a particle encountering a potential change, specifically questioning the coefficients in the wave function solutions for regions defined by different potentials.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to determine which coefficients in the wave function are zero and seeks to prove the existence of reflection at the potential drop. Some participants question the necessity of proving certain coefficients are zero, while others suggest focusing on boundary conditions to establish the relationship between the wave functions in different regions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring the implications of boundary conditions and the continuity of the wave function and its derivative at the potential boundary. There is a mix of skepticism and support regarding the need for proof of reflection, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the requirements of the problem, including the need for continuity at the boundary and the implications of the potential drop on the wave function behavior. There is an emphasis on the mathematical relationships rather than definitive conclusions.

cep
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello! I'm looking at a situation where there is a finite potential Vo for x<0, but zero potential for x>0. For a particle moving from left to right, I'm wondering what coefficients for the solution to the Schrödinger equation are equal to zero, and also how to prove that there is reflection even for a potential drop. hbar is h/(2π).

Homework Equations



Time-independent Schrödinger equation

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's what I'm thinking:

For x<0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k0)(Arighteik0x+Alefte-ik0x)
where k0 = √[2m(E+Vo)/hbar2]

For x>0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k1)(Brighteik1x+Blefte-ik1x)
where k1 = √[2m(E)/hbar2]

I think that Bleft is zero, as there is nothing to cause reflection past the potential drop. How can I prove this, and that Aleft is non-zero (ie, potential drop produces reflection)? I know that the wave function and its derivative must be continuous at x=0-- is that sufficient?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, it lost the sub/superscripts. Here are the rewritten equations

For x<0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k0)*(Arighteik0x+Alefte-ik0x)
where k0 = √[2m(E+Vo)/hbar2]

For x>0, ψ(x) = 1/√(k1)*(Brighteik1x+Blefte-ik1x)
where k1 = √[2m(E)/hbar2]
 
There's nothing to prove. Just state the reason you gave for why Bleft=0. That's enough.
 
... really? I'm skeptical-- the problem asks for a proof.
 
*proof that a potential drop causes reflection, not proof of which coefficient is zero.
 
If you know that B-left is 0 then you know what the form of the equation is on the right side (x>0)

Now its just a boundary condition problem. you need to find A-left and A-right so that the two equations match up at x = 0. Set the two equations equal to each other at x = 0 and also set their derivates to be equal at x = 0. Then its just 2 equations 2 unknowns.

You should find that for the two equations to match up A-left cannot be 0 and there's your proof of reflection
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K