Schrödinger Equation (why are U and -x^2 =0?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Schrödinger Equation and the specific condition where U and -x^2 equal zero. The original poster expresses confusion about why U cannot simply be set to zero, as it is defined as a function of x within the problem constraints. There is an emphasis on the independence of x, which can take values between -L and L. The poster seeks clarification on their reasoning and the validity of their procedure. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of interpreting the equation and the conditions involved.
Que7i
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
New poster has been reminded to use LaTeX for math equations (not pictures of their work)
Homework Statement
A subatomic particle with mass m is in a one-dimensional potential well. The potential energy is infinite for x < −L and for x > +L, while for −L < x < L, the potential energy is given by:U(x) =(−ℏ^2x^2)/(mL^2(L^2 − x^2)
The particle is in a stationary state described by the wave function 𝜓(x) = A(1 − x^2/L^2)
for −L < x < +L and by 𝜓(x) = 0 elsewhere. (Assume A is a positive, real constant.)
What is the total energy E of the system in terms of ℏ, m, and L?
Relevant Equations
-ℏ/(2m)d^2𝜓/dx^2+U𝜓=E𝜓
I've already found out how to do it, but, either I got lucky and my procedure is wrong or I just don't get it. Why are U and -x^2 equal 0?
1658321022479.png
1658320980320.png
 

Attachments

  • 1658320869118.png
    1658320869118.png
    13.8 KB · Views: 122
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot pick ##U = 0##, it is given in the problem to be a particular function of x. Furthermore ##x## is an independent variable that can take any value between ##-L## and ##L##.
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Que7i said:
I've already found out how to do it, but, either I got lucky and my procedure is wrong or I just don't get it. Why are U and -x^2 equal 0?
I can't tell what your reasoning is from your work. Could you explain to us what you're doing?
 
  • Like
Likes malawi_glenn
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top