Schrödinger's cat paradox explaination

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Schrödinger's Cat paradox illustrates the concept of superposition in quantum mechanics, where a cat can be simultaneously dead and alive until observed. This thought experiment, introduced by Erwin Schrödinger, critiques the interpretation of quantum mechanics by highlighting its counterintuitive nature. The paradox serves to question the absurdity of quantum predictions versus classical intuition, emphasizing that our understanding of reality may be limited by human perception. The discussion reveals varying interpretations, with some viewing it as a critique of quantum mechanics itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the concept of superposition
  • Knowledge of Erwin Schrödinger's contributions to physics
  • Basic grasp of philosophical implications in scientific theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum superposition in real-world applications
  • Explore Erwin Schrödinger's original papers on wave mechanics
  • Investigate the philosophical debates surrounding quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, philosophers interested in the implications of quantum theory, and anyone seeking to understand the complexities of quantum mechanics and its interpretations.

ARR0624
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I understand the set up of the paradox...

I just do not understand what it is trying to explain
Any one mind trying to dumb this down?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The paradox is the dead-alive state that the cat is in before the observation.

The paradox is designed to make quantum mechanics look absurd or equivalently show that quantum mechanics predicts an absurd world.

Some people interperet this as saying the world is strange, and some people interpret it as saying quantum mechanics is strange.

For the record, "Shrodinger's cat" originated as a throw-away line in one of Shrodinger's papers about the statistical interpretation of wave mechanics, and the writing is neutral enough, with the author suggesting the absurdity of the cat situation, and allowing the reader to draw his conclusions.
 
Yup, it basically is saying that QM is strange because our everyday world intuition says the cat is either dead or alive, we just don't know. QM says its both :P
 
ARR0624 said:
I understand the set up of the paradox...

I just do not understand what it is trying to explain
Any one mind trying to dumb this down?

Thanks.

Please do a search in this forum for this topic. There have been plenty.

Zz.
 
Schrödinger's Cat is really quite a naff idea; it's been heavily overused and misquoted as something meaningful. Obviously you can't have a cat that's half alive and half dead. Talking about Schrödinger's Cat as being about anything meaningful makes about as much sense as talking about going past the egde of the universe, or asking what happened before the Big Bang.
 
This issue is being very exaggerated.
The cat can be both dead and alive at the same time , unless you can do an observation.
This is somehow close to the following statement(i don't know if i wrote it right): If a tree falls in a forest and there is nobody around ,will the crash make a sound ?
I believe the problem is when we include our human subjective into the system.Just because in our understanding mean that something is absurd , that doesn't mean that it's wrong..
The strange thing about this world and QM is us..
 
There is a thing called 'probability' in quantum mechanics. One does not need to go into overdrive with philosophical questions or claiming that it is as useless as discussing what happened before Big Bang to understand that.
 
Thank you all who answered and I'm sorry zapper for not searching before I posted a new thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
11K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
4K