Sci calc can read numbers in scientific notation format

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the capabilities of the scientific calculator found at web2.0calc.com, specifically its ability to handle numbers in scientific notation. A user initially struggles to read the result of multiplying 20 raised to the power of 103 due to its enormity. They later discover that pressing the equals button twice reveals the answer, indicating a lack of clarity in the calculator's instructions. The conversation highlights the need for better guidance on using the calculator effectively. Overall, the calculator can read and display large numbers, but users may find its functionality less intuitive.
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
Does anyone know if this scientific calculator

http://web2.0calc.com/

can read numbers in scientific notation format. If you multiply 20^103 you get a huge number and I can't read it because it's so huge.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
never mind, i got it. press = twice. they should have made that more obvious. the instructions were well hidden.
 
bobsmith76 said:
Does anyone know if this scientific calculator

http://web2.0calc.com/

can read numbers in scientific notation format. If you multiply 20^103 you get a huge number and I can't read it because it's so huge.

Use Python:

>>> 20**103
101412048018258352119736256430080000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
>>>
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

Writing Scientific Notation: Alternatives to mx10n
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Uncomputable Numbers and Rational Approximations
Replies
4
Views
2K
I What is the role of geometry and dimensional operations?
Replies
3
Views
2K
A question about the proper use of certain notation
Replies
14
Views
2K
B Cartesian Space vs. Euclidean Space
Replies
10
Views
2K
Can Hard Sci-Fi Incorporate Fantastical Elements Successfully?
Replies
16
Views
3K
Is My Sci-Fi Story's Scientific Premise Believable?
Replies
17
Views
5K
B Excel: converting a 3-ish week count into a monthly count
Replies
15
Views
1K
B The Paradox of 1 – 1 + 1 – 1 + 1 – 1 + …
Replies
5
Views
2K
MHB Expressing a number in scientific notation and factoring a cubic
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top