Science review of the movie Contact?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the scientific accuracy and thematic elements of the movie "Contact," particularly in relation to its portrayal of science, religion, and technology. Participants explore various aspects of the film, including its narrative choices and the implications of its plot elements.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants appreciate the movie for its social commentary, particularly the tension between science and religion.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between the movie and the book, specifically regarding the representation of proof of extraterrestrial contact, with some preferring the book's idea of a circle in the digits of π.
  • Concerns are raised about the scientific plausibility of the camera recording only static during the protagonist's journey, with interpretations suggesting possible electromagnetic interference.
  • Participants speculate on the motivations of the aliens for not providing evidence of the trip, with some suggesting it was intentional to prevent humanity from misusing the technology.
  • There are questions about the compatibility of the capsule with human technology and the implications of humanity's readiness for such contact.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of interpretations regarding the film's themes and scientific elements, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a consensus on the accuracy or intent behind specific plot points.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying interpretations of the film's narrative choices and the scientific principles involved, as well as unresolved questions about the implications of the aliens' actions and the nature of the technology depicted.

LLD1231
Messages
5
Reaction score
60
I’m curious as to what you guys thought of the movie Contact. How well does it stand up to science and physics?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how well it stands up to science per se but I really liked it and the book more for its social commentary. One thing that resonated with me was the tension between science and religion that the movie presented and how fanatics could go to any length to destroy in the name of religion.

The movie used the 18 hours of blank tape as proof of her traveling to the distant world whereas the book used the computer finding the image of a circle in the digits of ##\pi##. Personally, I liked the circle in ##\pi## idea because that was more profound and pleasing solution.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Rubidium_71 and pinball1970
Interesting about the computer. I think that’s better, too. I never read the book. I might do that. Yes, the religious factor was interesting. I was also intrigued by the conflict between science and government. It reminded me of how Oppenheimer was treated; the big egos that surrounded the whole thing.
 
I'm not sure. How could you have an influence on digits of pi? It is a mathematical constant that doesn't depend on the physical laws in our universe.
Or do I misunderstand what the book did? I just saw the movie.
 
LLD1231 said:
I’m curious as to what you guys thought of the movie Contact. How well does it stand up to science and physics?

If it is the Jodie Foster one then awesome. Not seen the other one (2018)

@jedishfru

It irritated me her camera only recorded static, if it was a stand-alone device why would it pick only static up?

Transmitting information remotely back to mission control through a worm hole would probably be an issue but I can’t see why bog standard images and videos could not be used on Vega
 
pinball1970 said:
If it is the Jodie Foster one then awesome. Not seen the other one (2018)

Is there a new Contact movie coming in 2018?? Contact 1997 is a great movie!
 
mfb said:
I'm not sure. How could you have an influence on digits of pi? It is a mathematical constant that doesn't depend on the physical laws in our universe.
Or do I misunderstand what the book did? I just saw the movie.

The implication was the universe was somehow engineered so that the value of ##\pi## had a circle image embedded in the coding of the digits.

Sagan didn’t go into details about how it was encoded only that it was. We are left to imagine how and where it might be found.
 
pinball1970 said:
It irritated me her camera only recorded static, if it was a stand-alone device why would it pick only static up?
I interpreted it as "The aliens didn't want the humans to have a clear record of what exactly happened."
 
  • #10
pinball1970 said:
It irritated me her camera only recorded static, if it was a stand-alone device why would it pick only static up?

Transmitting information remotely back to mission control through a worm hole would probably be an issue but I can’t see why bog standard images and videos could not be used on Vega

I interpreted this to mean the forces that she was subjected to were electromagnetic in nature and so scrambled what was recorded on her magnetic tape device.

If however the recording was an SSD then the forces caused it to record only static perhaps by scrambling the signal from the camera component to memory or scrambled it directly in the SSD as a kind of EMP effect but not enough to burn it out.
 
  • #11
mfb said:
I interpreted it as "The aliens didn't want the humans to have a clear record of what exactly happened."

Then why go to all that trouble?
“Hey we’re here! We want to make contact and this is the plans to build a machine to reach us but when you get here no images or recordings please.”

The consequences were no one believed her when she got back and she was made out to be a liar and fraudster.
 
  • #12
jedishrfu said:
I interpreted this to mean the forces that she was subjected to were electromagnetic in nature and so scrambled what was recorded on her magnetic tape device.

If however the recording was an SSD then the forces caused it to record only static perhaps by scrambling the signal from the camera component to memory or scrambled it directly in the SSD as a kind of EMP effect but not enough to burn it out.
That is more plausible, frustrating but plausible.
 
  • #13
pinball1970 said:
That is more plausible, frustrating but plausible.

Yeah sci fi movies are like real life where we need plausible answers to improbable events and impossible devices and the authors leave it up to the readership to fill in the details.
 
  • #14
pinball1970 said:
Then why go to all that trouble?
“Hey we’re here! We want to make contact and this is the plans to build a machine to reach us but when you get here no images or recordings please.”

The consequences were no one believed her when she got back and she was made out to be a liar and fraudster.

The ways of aliens are inscrutable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #15
jedishrfu said:
I interpreted this to mean the forces that she was subjected to were electromagnetic in nature and so scrambled what was recorded on her magnetic tape device.

If however the recording was an SSD then the forces caused it to record only static perhaps by scrambling the signal from the camera component to memory or scrambled it directly in the SSD as a kind of EMP effect but not enough to burn it out.
If it was an accident and the aliens were fine with evidence why didn't they give her some evidence of the trip? They knew the capsule would appear to just fall through the machine, it was easy to see that the question about evidence would come up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pinball1970
  • #16
mfb said:
If it was an accident and the aliens were fine with evidence why didn't they give her some evidence of the trip? They knew the capsule would appear to just fall through the machine, it was easy to see that the question about evidence would come up.

They said humanity wasn’t ready so no diplomatic mission was needed. They would have had to have known that her devices wouldn’t record anything other than the duration of the trip but to do anything to alter it would be to give their presence away and then others would try the same trip.

The ending is kind of like the Lost Dutchman’s gold mine story where the prospector loses the last piece of evidence wrapped in his handkerchief as he mops the sweat off of his brow. With no evidence the story is just a story.
 
  • #17
mfb said:
If it was an accident and the aliens were fine with evidence why didn't they give her some evidence of the trip? They knew the capsule would appear to just fall through the machine, it was easy to see that the question about evidence would come up.

For whatever inscrutable reason, the aliens wanted there to be no evidence of her trip.
 
  • #18
stevendaryl said:
For whatever inscrutable reason, the aliens wanted there to be no evidence of her trip.
That was my interpretation as well: It was not an accident that the recording got scrambled.
 
  • #19
I always took it that the capsule design was, in one way or another, incompatible with crude human technology operating within - much like it was incompatible with the chair they installed. The capsule was designed to safely carry a living organism, not a probe.

As for why they hadn't provided a means to record the trip to show as a proof she wasn't making it all up - I guess it's part of why humanity isn't ready. If, as a society, we still hadn't evolved past fundamental mistrust of our fellow humans, then we better not be trusted with being let loose on the galaxy.
Yeah, we can build the capsule, like we can build a club, a rocket, or a fusion device - but as long as we're not this idealistic unified utopia full of philosopher-scientists, that I always felt Sagan was hopeful for, then we would likely just use it to bash somebody's head with it.
The entire theme of the film seems to revolve around saying something along the lines of: 'Yer not goddamn ready, you insane technomonkeys. Sort yourself out first.'
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #20
Someone asked if I was talking about the movie that Jodie Foster was in — yes, that’s the one.

One thing that I thought the movie was trying to say was about God and faith and how lopsided that whole argument can get. Someone on the committee grilling her asked, “you expect us to take all this on faith”? The irony being that their whole issue with her going in the first place was that she didn’t profess to believe in God.
 
  • #21
Just imagine what a mess the ending would have been with the recording intact. I think that you could have similar ratios of believers and non-believers with the non-believers thinking that the proof was faked. For me, the original ending is better because you have people questioning what happened based on a lack of proof rather than a world where people choose not to believe even when presented with the truth. Movies should be an escape from reality. :oldwink:
 
  • #22
Borg said:
Just imagine what a mess the ending would have been with the recording intact. I think that you could have similar ratios of believers and non-believers with the non-believers thinking that the proof was faked. For me, the original ending is better because you have people questioning what happened based on a lack of proof rather than a world where people choose not to believe even when presented with the truth. Movies should be an escape from reality. :oldwink:

The whole world was already in a dilemma regarding the contact, the religious portrayed in the film were prepared to kill (and did) rather than their beliefs be challenged by science in this way. A sad mirror on humanity since the 17thC

"Baby steps" was the advice from the alien. No, pull off the plaster, take the hit and plunge into reality. Humanity will get over it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
12K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K