Screen capture of Windows Media Player

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around methods for capturing still images from video files using Windows Media Player and other software tools. Participants explore various applications and techniques for achieving this, including screen capture methods and alternative media players.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions difficulty capturing video images using Paint Shop Pro and seeks advice on obtaining a JPEG file from a video.
  • Another suggests using Windows Movie Maker for snapshots, and Animation Shop for breaking the movie into frames.
  • A participant explains that Windows Media Player uses DirectX, which complicates screen captures, and recommends VLC as an alternative for saving frames.
  • Media Player Classic is proposed as a preferred option for saving frames, along with suggestions for using MPlayer and VirtualDub for more advanced frame extraction.
  • General screen capture tools like SnagIt are mentioned for capturing video layers, with a potential workaround involving adjusting video card hardware acceleration settings in Paint Shop Pro.
  • One participant shares their success in capturing images and creating a web page to critique a video from Bob Lazar's website, discussing the video's perceived flaws.
  • Screen VidShot is recommended by another participant as a helpful tool for capturing images from videos.
  • Avidemux is introduced as a utility that can save images as JPEGs and has movie-making capabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views on the best methods and tools for capturing video images, with no consensus on a single solution. Various software options are discussed, each with its own advantages and limitations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific software capabilities and limitations, such as the impact of DirectX on screen capture functionality, but these points remain unresolved and depend on individual setups and preferences.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for users seeking to capture still images from videos, particularly those using Windows Media Player or looking for alternative software solutions.

pmb_phy
Messages
2,950
Reaction score
1
I have a mpeg video which I can play using Windows Media Player. I tried to do a screen capture using Paint Shop Pro. However the screen capture was unable to capture the image of the video on my screen. How can I get a video image into a jpeg file?

Pete
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Try using windows movie maker. It will allow snapshots of your video . Also Animation shop would break up the movie into frames, then just save the individual frame as a jpeg.
 
Media player uses diectX to draw directly to the video bypassing windows - so most screen capture won't work it just 'sees' the reserved area that directX is drawing into.
You could use something like VLC ( a free media player) to save a single frame or search for a screen capture that can do directX
 
As suggested, Windows Movie Maker is the simplest solution with what you already have [in Accessories...].

An alternative to using VLC, I prefer "Media Player Classic"... which can also save frames to a file. (Media Player Classic is my main video player... instead of using WMP.)
[command-line] MPlayer can extract frames from video into a file... which can be used in a script.

For something fancier than a media player...
try Virtualdub [which can import MPEG]... which can copy a frame to the clipboard.

For general screen-captures, including these video layers, try SnagIt.

I wonder if its possible for Paint Shop Pro to do the capture
by setting your video-card hardware-acceleration (in Display Properties->Settings->Advanced->Troubleshoot) to "None"...
possibly turning off DirectX features.
 
Last edited:
Thanks everyone. I was able to capture the photos I wanted and was able to construct the web page I wanted to create.

The video is from Bob Lazar's web site. Its at
http://www.boblazar.com/closed/download.htm#DISCFLIGHT.MPG

On the web page I just created I show that the video is a fraud. Its not as if it was hard to do either. Lazar claims to be a physicist who worked at Area 51 where the tested alien flying discs. He claims he was involved in the back engineering of the flying disk (although all he has for proof is a W2 form which shows he received $900 from US Naval inteligence in 1987). The video is quite reminisent of a commutor generated animation. The obvious fault, which Lazar either missed or didn't figure out, was that the light rays which are casting a shadow of the disk on the desert floor cannot have come from the Sun but had to come from a nearby point source! Its really obvious so you don't need the diagrams I created nor the web page either. Take a look and see what a poor job this so-called physicist did. :smile:

Best wishes

Pete
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I prefer use the program Screen VidShot, it very helps me in work.
 
Avidemux is a utility which has movie maker capability and also an option to save images as jpeg. It is available through snapfiles.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
16K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
993
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K