Second Order DE - Need Help With Equation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Clef
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Second order
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving constant-coefficient second order differential equations (DEs) using methods such as the homogeneous solution approach and the variation of parameters method. The user successfully derived the homogeneous solution as (e^-3t)(Acos4t + Bsin4t) and is attempting to find a particular solution for the equation z'' + 6z' + 25z = -292e^(i4t). The variation of parameters method is emphasized as a straightforward technique once the basis of the solution space is established, leading to a general solution that incorporates free parameters from integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of constant-coefficient second order differential equations
  • Familiarity with the variation of parameters method
  • Knowledge of homogeneous and particular solutions in differential equations
  • Basic proficiency in solving linear algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of variation of parameters in detail
  • Learn how to apply the Laplace Transform to solve differential equations
  • Explore the characteristics of non-linear ordinary differential equations (ODEs)
  • Practice solving second order DEs with different forcing functions
USEFUL FOR

Students, mathematicians, and engineers who are working with differential equations, particularly those seeking to deepen their understanding of second order DEs and solution techniques.

Clef
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hey Guys,

I've been banging my head with this one for a few days now. I've done (a) and (b) but I'm yet to do (c) if someone could complete this for me or help me along the way that would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks heaps!

ARnkrl.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know anything about solving constant-coefficient second order DEs?

Suggestion: Solve the homogemous, find a particular solution, then i = i_t + i_p where i_t = Solution to the homogenous, and i_p = particular solution.

Alternatively, if you knew Laplace Transform, you could try that as well.
 
Okay
I've found my homogenous solution to be
(e^-3t)(Acos4t + Bsin4t)

I'm now attempting the particular solution by changing the original equation into the complex form:

z'' + 6z' +25z = -292e^(i4t)

And solving that. To be honest I am completely stuck where to go from here and my attempts have been going in a very roundabout way.
:(
 
read some about the variation of parameters method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_variation_of_parameters

basically if {u1,u2} are the basis of the homogenous solution space, you assume the private solution
of the NH equation is:
A(t)*u1(t)+B(t)*u2(t)

playing around with the ODE you get the linear system

u1*(dA/dt)+u2*(dB/dt)=0
(du1/dt)*(dA/dt)+(du2/dt)*(dB/dt)=q(t)

where q(t) is the NH part. you get A' and B' and then by integration you get A(t),B(t).
Notice that A*u1+B*u2 will be the general solution for the ODE because A,B will contain
the free parameters (due to integration).
 
elibj123 said:
read some about the variation of parameters method
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method_of_variation_of_parameters

basically if {u1,u2} are the basis of the homogenous solution space, you assume the private solution
of the NH equation is:
A(t)*u1(t)+B(t)*u2(t)

playing around with the ODE you get the linear system

u1*(dA/dt)+u2*(dB/dt)=0
(du1/dt)*(dA/dt)+(du2/dt)*(dB/dt)=q(t)

where q(t) is the NH part. you get A' and B' and then by integration you get A(t),B(t).
Notice that A*u1+B*u2 will be the general solution for the ODE because A,B will contain
the free parameters (due to integration).

I'm really sorry. But I do not completely understand this method. Would it be the same as substituting
y= tAcos4t+tbsin4t into the equation and then equating to get the PS?
 
or is it sufficient to use
i= Acos4t + Bcos4t

for the solution for the particular solution of the whole DE?

Because I read somewhere that for some reason you have to put

i= t(Acos4t + Bsin4t)

but this is very very confusing :'(
 
I'm familiar with the substitution method but i don't like it because as you said it has many rules depending on the characteristic polynomial of the equation (i am not sure if this method even works for non-linear ode).

Variation of Parameters method is pretty simple once you have the basis of the solution-space.
The technique is very simple (without going into developing the method):
if you have a basis u_{j} (in this case you found 2 functions)
then you get n linear equations of n variable k^{'}_{j}.

each equation is of the form:
\sum^{n}_{j=1}(\frac{d^{i}u_{j}}{dt^{i}}*k^{'}_{j})=0, \forall i=0,...,n-2

and for i=n-1 you get the equation:
\sum^{n}_{j=1}(\frac{d^{n-1}u_{j}}{dt^{n-1}}*k^{'}_{j})=g(t)

these are algebrical euqations. after you solve them you must integrate and then you
get n functions:
k_{j}(t)=\int(k^{'}_{j})dt+c_{j}

and you put them back in the "linear"-combination

u_{general}(t)=\sum^{n}_{j=1}(k_j(t)*u_{j}(t))
 
okay. I think I've sort of got a handle on this way.
Would it be

=A'cos4t +B'sin4t = 0
-A'4sin4t + B'cos4t = -292sin4t

Then by equating coefficients and integrating
=A' = 73
therefore A = -73t
B' = 0
therefore B= 0

therefore the PS is -73tsin4t?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K