Seeking closed form solution of Navier-Stokes for a fluid in an annular space.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Navier-Stokes equations for a fluid in an annular space between a stationary exterior cylinder and a rotating interior cylinder. The user simplifies the equations in cylindrical coordinates and seeks a closed-form solution for the velocity profiles, specifically u_θ and u_z. They highlight the challenges of numerical modeling methods, including mesh generation and iterative solving, while referencing known solutions for Taylor-Couette flow at low rotational speeds. The user emphasizes the desire for a repeatable, straightforward solution rather than a complex numerical approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Knowledge of fluid dynamics, specifically Taylor-Couette flow
  • Familiarity with boundary layer theory
  • Basic skills in numerical modeling techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research closed-form solutions for Navier-Stokes equations in cylindrical coordinates
  • Study Taylor-Couette flow and its analytical solutions at various rotational speeds
  • Explore numerical methods for fluid dynamics, focusing on mesh generation and iterative solving
  • Investigate boundary layer interactions in annular flow systems
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics researchers, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in modeling flow in annular spaces or studying the Navier-Stokes equations.

MudEngineer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a pressure flow problem where I'm trying to understand the velocity profile of a fluid in an annular space between a stationary exterior cylinder and a rotating, longitudinally advancing cylinder at its center.

So the boundary conditions a zero velocity at the exterior surface and a constant angular and longitudinal velocity at the interior surface.

I begin by simplifying the usual form of Navier-Stokes in cylindrical coordinates to the following three equations, knowing that acceleration and velocity in the radial direction are zero:

[1] -ρ(u_θ^2)/r=μ*(2/r^2)((∂u_θ)/∂θ)-(∂u_θ)/∂θ+ρ*g_r

[2] ρ((∂u_θ)/∂t+(u_θ/r)((∂u_θ)/∂θ)+u_z*((∂u_θ)/∂z))=μ[(∂^2*u_θ)/(∂r^2 )+(1/r^2)*((∂^2 u_θ)/(∂θ^2))+(∂^2 u_θ)/(∂z^2 )]-(1/r)(∂p/∂θ)+ρ*g_θ

[3] ρ((∂u_z)/∂t+(u_θ/r)(∂u_z)/∂θ+u_z*(∂u_z)/∂z)=μ[(∂^2*u_z)/(∂r^2)+(1/r^2)(∂u_z)/(∂θ^2)+(∂^2*u_z)/(∂z^2)]-∂p/∂z+ρ*g_z

How do I solve for u_θ and u_z??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why should the solution be "closed form"?
Most answers to the questions of life, universe and everything are not closed form solutions.
 
I've been considering different ways to find a numerical solution, but for the sake of repeatability I'd like to find a solution with a couple of neat equations that I can just plug and chug down the road.

Most of the numerical modeling methods involve several different steps, including generation of a mesh, iterative solving using some form of programming, and then finding a way to make that data usable for later calculations. Unfortunately, generating the velocity profile is only the first step of the problem.
 
I'm not going to do the entire calculation, but, if I remember correctly, there is an exact solution to fluid motion through a pipe (cylinder) and the fronts (motion of what was initially a cross section of the pipe) are paraboloids.
 
That's the standard solution for steady-state, pressure driven flow in a stationary pipe. In this case we have two boundary layers. In the attached image, I'm trying to solve for the velocity profile between the two boundary layers, where the outer (brown) layer is stationary, and the inner (blue pipe) layer is moving to the right and rotating.
 

Attachments

  • fig2.jpg
    fig2.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 480
I think what you are describing is Taylor-Couette flow. For very low rotational speeds it has a known solution (like V=Ar+B/r, where A and B depend on radius and rotational speed), but it quickly becomes difficult to get analytic solutions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K