Seesaw mass matrix and neutrino masses

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the seesaw mass matrix used to explain neutrino masses, represented as [[0, m], [m, M]]. The eigenvalues derived from this matrix are M and -m^2/M in the limit where M >> m. The negative eigenvalue raises questions about its physical interpretation, as established literature, including works by Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra, and R.D. Peccei, indicates that mass eigenstates are typically presented without the negative sign. The negative mass is linked to the Majorana phase of the eigenstate, emphasizing that the physical mass is the absolute value of the eigenvalue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory concepts
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of Majorana and Dirac mass terms
  • Basic grasp of neutrino physics and seesaw mechanism
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Majorana phases in neutrino mass models
  • Study the derivation and significance of the seesaw mechanism in particle physics
  • Examine the differences between Dirac and Majorana mass matrices
  • Explore the literature on neutrino mass eigenstates, focusing on works by Y. Chikashige and R.N. Mohapatra
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers focusing on neutrino mass models and the seesaw mechanism.

rruben
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi

Since a few days I've been confused about the seesaw mass matrix explaining neutrino masses. It is the following matrix:
\begin{pmatrix} 0 & m\\ m & M \\ \end{pmatrix}.

As can easily be checked it has two eigenvalues which are given by M and -m^2/M in the limit M>>m (the limit doesn't really matter one is always negative when M and m are positive). It seems really weird to me that you would have a negative mass.

As a lot of papers on the subject (Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei, Phys. Lett. B98 (1981) 265 and others) will tell you the "mass eigenstates" have masses M and m^2/M without the minus sign. This makes me feel like I'm missing something that makes the sign irrelevant. Could anyone help me with this?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sign is not irrelevant, it is related to the Majorana phase of the eigenstate. The mass of the particle is the absolute value of the eigenvalue.

Edit: You will notice that also the Dirac mass matrix
$$
\begin{pmatrix}
0 & m \\
m & 0
\end{pmatrix}
$$
has one positive and one negative eigenvalue.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rruben
Thanks for your reply. I will look into it a bit more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K