Self-learning math for a physics major

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a physics major seeking to enhance their mathematical knowledge to support their research in theoretical physics. Key areas of focus include rigorous self-study in numerical mathematics, probability and statistics, and advanced topics such as differential geometry and topology. Recommended resources include Baez's book list and Thurston's "3-dimensional Geometry and Topology," which connects hyperbolic space to Minkowski space-time. The participant emphasizes the importance of aligning mathematical study with relevant physics papers to leverage physical intuition in learning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of multivariable calculus and partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with linear algebra and complex analysis
  • Basic knowledge of differential geometry and topology
  • Awareness of theoretical physics concepts, particularly in condensed matter and high energy theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Baez's book list for rigorous mathematics resources
  • Study Thurston's "3-dimensional Geometry and Topology" for insights into hyperbolic space
  • Learn numerical methods for solving non-trivial PDEs relevant to physics
  • Research probability and statistics applications in cosmology and high energy physics (HEP)
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics majors, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in bridging gaps in mathematical knowledge to enhance their understanding of physics concepts.

tut_einstein
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I'm a physics major and I'm pretty sure that I want to go into theoretical physics research. Due to scheduling difficulties and such, I haven't been able to systematically study math. I'm am very comfortable with all the basic math that any physics major should know - multivariable calc, PDEs, linear algebra, complex analysis (Riemann sheets, Cauchy integration techniques etc..), tensors, a little bit of group theory...I have also worked enough with differential geometry and topology since I do gravitational physics research.

I want to fill the gaps in my math education by reading books (rigorous, challenging ones) and teaching myself things that I probably missed. I have been following the MIT open courseware site, but since I do have a time constraint, I was wondering which topics I must focus on and which books/lecture notes are good for them (considering that I would like these topics to give me greater insight into physics.) I don't know if this matters, but I am deciding between theoretical condensed matter physics and high energy theory.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since I'm feeling lazy, I'll just refer you to Baez's book list:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/books.html

I'll add a couple things. Thurston's 3-dimensional Geometry and Topology has a good discussion of how hyperbolic space ties in with Minkowski space-time. This is a key to understanding why SL(2, C) is the double cover of the identity component of the Lorentz transformations.

This page also has a lot of interesting stuff in it:

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/QG.html
 
tut_einstein said:
I want to fill the gaps in my math education by reading books (rigorous, challenging ones) and teaching myself things that I probably missed.

The two traditional gaps that physicists have are numerical mathematics (i.e. most non-trivial PDE's involve some sort of computer simulation) and probability and statistics (extremely important in interpreting observations in cosmology and HEP.)

I have been following the MIT open courseware site, but since I do have a time constraint, I was wondering which topics I must focus on and which books/lecture notes are good for them (considering that I would like these topics to give me greater insight into physics.)

One problem is that it's an infinite pool, and you'll never learn everything even if you spend your entire life at it.

One thing that I've found useful is to start with the papers that are relevant to the physics that I'm interested and then focus on the mathematics that is used for that physics. One reason this is useful for me is that I'm dreadful at "pure mathematics" but if you can point at that such and such math is used in such and such situation, then I can use my physical intuition to make up for weakness in mathematics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
9K