Semi Empirical Mass Formula and Neutron Stars

  • Thread starter Thread starter city2113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutron stars
city2113
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Using the liquid drop model but adding a term for gravity to apply it to a neutron star, with only a large number of neutrons, rewrite the binding energy equation for this case
Relevant Equations
Semi Empirical Mass Formula: B(A,Z) = avA - asA^(2/3)-aa(A-2Z)^2/A+ap(delta/A^(1/2))
Gravity Term to add: (3/5)((G/ro)A^2*mn^2)/A^(-1/3)
Sorry, the equations are messy. I already know the answer to the actual homework problem, but I don't really know why certain terms are neglected.
I know that the equation will only include the volume term, symmetry term and the extra added gravity term. I just want to understand why

I know that the coulomb term is ignored because if you have only neutrons, there is no charge to consider.
I also know that the surface term and the pairing term become negligible at very large N values, but I don't know why.

Could someone explain why the surface and pairing terms get neglected in this case?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi @city2113 and welcome to PF.

I don’t understand enough to know why the pairing term becomes negligible. But see if this helps with the surface term...

The volume term depends on the total number of nucleons and the number of (very short range strong nuclear force) interactions of each nucleon with its neighbours.

The surface term is simply a correction to the volume term to allow for the fact that surface nucleons have fewer neighbours than the internal nucleons.

Suppose there are ##A## nucleons and ##f## is the fraction of the nucleons which are at the surface.

What do you think happens to ##f## as ##A## gets big?
 
Ohh ok, so as the number of nucleons (A) gets bigger, the fraction of nucleons on the surface would be smaller compared to the total number of nucleons. Once A becomes really bug the effect of the ones on the surface having fewer neighbors becomes so small that it's negligible because there are far more in the middle.

Thank you, that helps a lot!
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top