Separation of Plasma into positive nucleus and negative electrons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of separating plasma into positive nuclei and negative electrons, and whether this can be effectively contained within a magnetic bottle. Participants explore various methods for achieving this separation, including the implications of plasma properties and confinement techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that an electric field can provide separation, but note that the attractive forces between electrons and nuclei limit effectiveness unless the plasma is thin.
  • Others propose that powerful lasers or fast particles can temporarily separate electrons from nuclei, referencing plasma wakefield acceleration as an example.
  • A participant describes magnetic confinement principles, explaining that plasma must be heated to high temperatures to achieve separation and discusses various heating methods, including electrical discharge and neutral beam injection.
  • One participant mentions that an MHD generator can separate charges in a moving plasma.
  • Another participant questions the initial premise, stating that plasma is defined by its net neutral charge and suggests that starting with plasma may not be the best approach for achieving separation.
  • There is a discussion about the energy required to separate protons and electrons, with a participant noting that this energy scales non-linearly with the number of particles involved.
  • Concerns are raised about the immense forces involved in such separations, with references to the strength of electric forces in molecular structures.
  • A later reply critiques proponents of the Electric Universe theory, suggesting that they overlook significant physical forces at play.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility and methods of separating plasma into charged components. There is no consensus on the best approach or the practicality of achieving such separation.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the definitions of plasma, the energy requirements for separation, and the implications of electrostatic forces. These factors remain unresolved in the discussion.

Blaze
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Im wondering if plasma is possible to be separated into a positive nucleus and negative electrons and contained within a magnetic bottle ?
If possible, what is the most efficient method of achieving it ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electric field will provide some separation, but the electrons and nuclei attract each other so it won't give a good separation unless the plasma is pretty thin.

A powerful laser or a bunch of fast electrons or protons can separate them temporarily (as the electrons move much faster), this is used in plasma wakefield acceleration.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Blaze and vanhees71
Blaze said:
Im wondering if plasma is possible to be separated into a positive nucleus and negative electrons and contained within a magnetic bottle ?
If possible, what is the most efficient method of achieving it ?
That is the principle of magnetic confinement in which a gas is heated to hundreds or thousands of times the ionization energy of the nuclei. For example, the ionization energy of hydrogen is 13.6 eV, and hydrogen (and deuterium and tritium) are heated to temperatures (or kinetic energies) of 5 to 100 keV, in the case of a D+T plasma (optimal temperature ~50 keV for fusion. A pure D plasma would require heating to about 200 keV for fusion, and other plasmas require higher temperatures.

Plasma heating can be accomplished by an electrical discharge (high current), a rapidly increasing magnetic field (adiabatic (actually quasi-adiabatic) compression), and/or electromagnetic (e.g., microwave) heating.

For optimal heating one must consider the energy losses, which include recombination (and photon emission), bremsstrahlung radiation, other (cyclotron) radiation, neutral particle loss and conduction losses.

Update/edit: Neutral beam injection is another method of heating (and fueling) a plasma. Fuel atoms are ionized, the nuclei accelerated, then recombined with electrons prior to injection into plasma. Collisions of neutral atoms with electrons and nuclei ionize the neutral atoms and provide heating to the plasma. For stability, a plasma must be held neutral, i.e., the number of electrons must equal the total charges on the nuclei.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK and Blaze
Blaze said:
Im wondering if plasma is possible to be separated into a positive nucleus and negative electrons and contained within a magnetic bottle ?
What are you actually suggesting here? The definition of a plasma is that it has net neutral charge. If you split it then the resulting + and - charges can be channelled through rings (as in the LHC) and made to travel thousands of metres under the control of carefully shaped magnetic fields, if you want. It strikes me that starting with a plasma may not be the best way.
Did you have a particular experiment in mind?
 
I'm wondering whether the poster means the complete separation of protons and electrons into two separate populations, each in a magnetic bottle? That could be done for small numbers of particles, but the energy required to overcome the resultant electrostatic field forces would scale non-linearly with number.
 
sciFax said:
but the energy required to overcome the resultant electrostatic field forces would scale non-linearly with number.
Absolutely immense forces involved! Such forces (in molecules) allow steel cables to support huge loads and steel beams to support skyscrapers. And, in those cases, the electric forces only operate between local protons and electrons.
This Hyperphysics link will allow you to find the amount of force between any values of charge and any separation you may choose.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sciFax
sophiecentaur said:
Absolutely immense forces involved!
Yes, indeed. This is also one of the many facts conveniently swept under the rug by proponents of the silly Electric Universe "cosmology." Takes all sorts.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
906
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
13K