Finding Separable Solutions for a Second-Order Partial Differential Equation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using separation of variables to solve the second-order partial differential equation d²y/dt² - c²(d²y/dx²) + w²y = 0. The initial approach involves expressing the solution as y = X(x)T(t) and deriving two independent ordinary differential equations (ODEs) from it. Participants emphasize the necessity of equating the resulting expressions to a constant for further analysis. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding that both equations must equal the same constant for the separation method to work effectively. The final inquiry revolves around whether integration of the separated equations leads to a general solution.
hhhmortal
Messages
175
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi, I don't really understand separation of variables very well, and I was hoping to do get my mind more clear on the following question:

(Q) Use separation of variables to find all the separable solutions of the equation:

d²y/dt² -c²(d²y/dx²) + w²y = 0

where 'w' and c are constants.




The Attempt at a Solution



I first started by saying the solution to this equation can be written as:

y = X(x)T(t)

so: X(d²T/dt²) - c²(d²X/dx²)T + w²XT

divide through by XT we get:

(1/T)d²T/dt² -(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) + w² = 0

What would be the next step? How can I find a solution from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
now you just have two independent DEQs to solve

(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = 0

(1/T)d²T/dt² + w² = 0
 
waht said:
now you just have two independent DEQs to solve

(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = 0

(1/T)d²T/dt² + w² = 0


Shouldn't it be -(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = 0 ?

and shouldn't it be equated to a constant?

How would I go around to get a solution for these equations anyways?
 
yea never mind, you should equate them to some constant

(c²/X)(d²X/dx²) = k

(1/T)d²T/dt² + w² = k
 
Put one variable on one side and the other variable on the other side. For them to be equal they both need to be equal to the same constant! It is not some kind of lame trick to just equate them to a constant. Convince yourself that they must be equal to a constant.
 
Cyosis said:
Put one variable on one side and the other variable on the other side. For them to be equal they both need to be equal to the same constant! It is not some kind of lame trick to just equate them to a constant. Convince yourself that they must be equal to a constant.

Oh ok. So now that I have both equated to the same constant, Do I just integrate both to get a solution or is there a general solution I can deduce from this?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K