Sequence and subsequence - real analysis

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in real analysis concerning an increasing sequence and its subsequence. The original poster is attempting to show certain properties of the sequence and subsequence, specifically regarding limits and the existence of indices.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are discussing the interpretation of the statement regarding the existence of an index k such that n ≤ nk. There is an exploration of the implications of this condition, particularly in relation to the infinite nature of the subsequence.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications on the interpretation of the problem statement, while others express uncertainty about how to proceed with the proof. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the notation and the implications of the subsequence being infinite. The original poster has acknowledged a misunderstanding in their initial statement.

Dassinia
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hello,
Solving last exam and stuck in this exercise

Homework Statement


Consider an increasing sequence {xn} . We suppose ∃ x∈ℝ and {xnk} a sebsequence of {xn} and xnk→x
a/ Show that for any n∈ℕ , ∃ k∈ℕ as n≤nk
b/ Show that xn→x

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
For b/ it is easy.
But for a/ I really don't know how to do that

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dassinia said:
∃ k∈ℕ as n≤nk

I don't know how to interpret that statement. What is it that happens "as" [itex]n \le n_k[/itex] ?
 
If you mean "n∈ℕ , ∃ k∈ℕ such that n≤nk" that just says that, given any integer n, there exist an "nk", an index from the subsequence, larger than n. And that comes from the fact that the subsequence is infinite.
 
Yes sorry it is such that , it was late !
I don't know where to start from to get to this result ? :oldconfused:
 
Dassinia said:
Yes sorry it is such that , it was late !
I don't know where to start from to get to this result ? :oldconfused:

Well, what do you mean by nk ?

Isn't {nk} an increasing sequence in , so that {xnk} is a subsequence ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K