Series and Parallel RLC parameters

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding parameters for series and parallel RLC circuits, specifically their transfer functions. The user notes that their approach to deriving the transfer function for series RLC circuits is valid, but it fails for parallel RLC circuits. They mention that while the denominator calculations for series RLC yield correct results, the numerator leads to discrepancies. The user seeks clarification on their mistake in applying the same method to both configurations. Overall, the thread emphasizes the differences in handling transfer functions for series versus parallel RLC circuits.
baby_1
Messages
159
Reaction score
16

Homework Statement


I want to find different parameters of series and parallel RLC
for series RLC we have this transfer function
C%7D%7Bs%5E2+%5Cfrac%7Bs%7D%7BRC%7D+%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7BLC%7D%7D.gif

and we know that transfer function of second order system is something like this:we can assume H0=1
134053_eq-1.png

but
gif.gif
is wrong(when you use only denominator you find out that
gif.gif
).However the same approach works fine for parallel RLC.

what is my mistake?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a series RLC, from the denominator I find ## Q=\omega_o\frac L R##

What is your transfer function for the series circuit?
 
Hi,
Sorry , I mean that this approach works for Series RLC but not works for parallel RLC
Here is my calculation
preview.jpg

we know that
gif.gif


gif.gif


gif.gif


So in deliminator
gif-gif.gif
, but with numerator it is different

The same approach
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
30K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
25K