MHB Series Convergence and Divergence I

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the convergence and sums of different series. The first participant successfully determined that series (a) is convergent by splitting it into two geometric series, while series (c) was found to be divergent. For series (b), they struggled with calculating the common ratio and were advised to use partial fraction decomposition to recognize it as a telescoping series. After some clarification, it was concluded that the sum for series (b) is 1/2, correcting the earlier misunderstanding of negative values. Overall, the conversation highlights techniques for analyzing series convergence and calculating sums effectively.
ardentmed
Messages
158
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I have a few quick questions for the problem set I'm working on at the moment:
2014_07_15_320_5185576918465871c371_2.jpg


I'm mostly unsure of my response for b. For a, I just split the series into two parts and added 6+3 to get 9, and thus the series is convergent. For c, I got 3/5 after taking the limit, which is divergent because it does not equal 0.

However, for b, I'm having a hard time calculating r so that I can use the a/(1-r) formula to compute the sum. I'd really appreciate some help guys.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For b, using partial fraction decomposition or otherwise, represent each term as a difference of two expressions. Note that the second expression (with a minus) of each term is the same as the first expression (with a plus) of the next term. Therefore, this is a telescoping series.
 
ardentmed said:
Hey guys,

I have a few quick questions for the problem set I'm working on at the moment:
2014_07_15_320_5185576918465871c371_2.jpg


I'm mostly unsure of my response for b. For a, I just split the series into two parts and added 6+3 to get 9, and thus the series is convergent. For c, I got 3/5 after taking the limit, which is divergent because it does not equal 0.

However, for b, I'm having a hard time calculating r so that I can use the a/(1-r) formula to compute the sum. I'd really appreciate some help guys.

Thanks in advance.

The convergence of the second is easy, because for large values of n, $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum{ \frac{1}{4n^2 - 1} } \end{align*}$ behaves like $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum{ \frac{1}{4n^2} } = \frac{1}{4} \sum{ \frac{1}{n^2} } \end{align*}$, which is a convergent p series.

But as Evgeny said, to evaluate the value of the sum you must use a partial fraction decomposition to turn it into a telescopic series.
 
ardentmed said:
Hey guys,

I have a few quick questions for the problem set I'm working on at the moment:
2014_07_15_320_5185576918465871c371_2.jpg


I'm mostly unsure of my response for b. For a, I just split the series into two parts and added 6+3 to get 9, and thus the series is convergent. For c, I got 3/5 after taking the limit, which is divergent because it does not equal 0.

However, for b, I'm having a hard time calculating r so that I can use the a/(1-r) formula to compute the sum. I'd really appreciate some help guys.

Thanks in advance.

For a) I have no idea what you are talking about. Adding what 6 and what 3 to get what 9? What does that have to do with convergence?

Write it as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum{ \left( \frac{3}{2^{n-1}} + \frac{2}{3^{n-1}} \right) } = \sum{ \frac{3}{2^{n - 1}} } + \sum{ \frac{2}{3^{n-1}}} = 3\sum{ \left[ \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) ^{n - 1} \right] } + 2\sum{ \left[ \left( \frac{1}{3} \right) ^{n - 1} \right] } \end{align*}$

each of those is a geometric series with $\displaystyle \begin{align*} r_1 = \frac{1}{2} \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} r_2 = \frac{1}{3} \end{align*}$. Since these common ratios are all smaller than 1 in size, each of those geometric series is convergent and so the whole sum is convergent.

Also you can evaluate each geometric series using the formula $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{a}{1 - r} \end{align*}$.Your answer to (c) is correct.
 
Prove It said:
For a) I have no idea what you are talking about. Adding what 6 and what 3 to get what 9? What does that have to do with convergence?

Write it as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \sum{ \left( \frac{3}{2^{n-1}} + \frac{2}{3^{n-1}} \right) } = \sum{ \frac{3}{2^{n - 1}} } + \sum{ \frac{2}{3^{n-1}}} = 3\sum{ \left[ \left( \frac{1}{2} \right) ^{n - 1} \right] } + 2\sum{ \left[ \left( \frac{1}{3} \right) ^{n - 1} \right] } \end{align*}$

each of those is a geometric series with $\displaystyle \begin{align*} r_1 = \frac{1}{2} \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} r_2 = \frac{1}{3} \end{align*}$. Since these common ratios are all smaller than 1 in size, each of those geometric series is convergent and so the whole sum is convergent.

Also you can evaluate each geometric series using the formula $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{a}{1 - r} \end{align*}$.Your answer to (c) is correct.
Oh, I thought that if I separated the series into two parts, the sum of each should be 3 and 6 respectively, thus making the sum of the series 9 (the summation of the two). Is that incorrect?

Thanks in advance.

Edit: Also, for b, the telescoping series, I took the limit as it approaches infinity after crossing out all of the extraneous values. I ended up getting (-.5) +(-.5 /2n) +(-.5/(2n+1) = -1/2. Does that sound about right?

Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
ardentmed said:
Oh, I thought that if I separated the series into two parts, the sum of each should be 3 and 6 respectively, thus making the sum of the series 9 (the summation of the two). Is that incorrect?

Now I understand what you meant. Yes that is correct.
 
Prove It said:
Now I understand what you meant. Yes that is correct.

Thank you. Also, for b, the telescoping series, I took the limit as it approaches infinity after crossing out all of the extraneous values. I ended up getting (-.5) +(-.5 /2n) +(-.5/(2n+1) = -1/2. Does that sound about right?

Thanks again.
 
ardentmed said:
Also, for b, the telescoping series, I took the limit as it approaches infinity after crossing out all of the extraneous values. I ended up getting (-.5) +(-.5 /2n) +(-.5/(2n+1) = -1/2. Does that sound about right?
All terms in the series are positive. How did you get $-1/2$? Also, how did you get the denominator $2n$?
 
Evgeny.Makarov said:
All terms in the series are positive. How did you get $-1/2$? Also, how did you get the denominator $2n$?

Because when using partial fractions, I obtained A= 0.5 and B= -0.5, so the series is 0.5/(2n+1) - (.5)/(2n-1), so when the terms were crossing out, the first term was crossed out when simplifying, whereas the second term stayed put. Taking the limit thereof gave a negative value.
 
  • #10
ardentmed said:
Because when using partial fractions, I obtained A= 0.5 and B= -0.5, so the series is 0.5/(2n+1) - (.5)/(2n-1)
$\frac{1}{2n+1}$ is smaller than $\frac{1}{2n-1}$, so the difference you wrote is negative. In reality,
\[
\frac{1}{4n^2-1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{2n+1}\right).
\]
 
  • #11
Evgeny.Makarov said:
$\frac{1}{2n+1}$ is smaller than $\frac{1}{2n-1}$, so the difference you wrote is negative. In reality,
\[
\frac{1}{4n^2-1}=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{1}{2n-1}-\frac{1}{2n+1}\right).
\]

Alright, so the sum is 1/2 after taking that into consideration, correct?
 
  • #12
ardentmed said:
Alright, so the sum is 1/2 after taking that into consideration, correct?

Yes, well done :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K