Series Convergence/Divergence Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter malindenmoyer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the convergence or divergence of two infinite series: \(\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin{\frac{n\pi}{2}}}{n}\) and \(\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\ln{n}}{n^2}\). Participants explore various approaches to analyze these series, including comparison tests and the properties of alternating series.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of numerical terms to gain insights into the first series and question the validity of bounding a divergent series to prove divergence. There is an exploration of upper bound comparisons for the second series. The concept of alternating series is introduced, with attempts to define terms for the series.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided corrections and alternative approaches, particularly regarding the second series, suggesting a comparison to a convergent series. The first series is recognized as having alternating terms, and there is ongoing exploration of how to define the series appropriately. Guidance has been offered regarding the application of the alternating series test.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of series definitions, particularly with respect to terms that equal zero and the implications for convergence tests. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in defining series terms to facilitate analysis.

malindenmoyer
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Determine if the following converge or diverge and explain why.

1. [tex]\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\sin{\frac{n\pi}{2}}}{n}[/tex]

2. [tex]\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{\ln{n}}{n^2}[/tex]For (1) I know that the numerator is bounded by -1 and 1 but do not know how to solve it from there.

For (2) I used the comparison test and did the following:

[tex]\frac{\ln{n}}{n^2} < \frac{n}{n^2} = \frac{1}{n}[/tex]

and then

[tex]\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n}[/tex] diverges (harmonic series) therefore (2) diverges by Comparison Test.

Is this the proper way to solve (2)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first one, write out the first 5 or 6 terms of the series numerically and see if that gives you any ideas. For the second one, no, bounding a series above by a divergent series doesn't prove it diverges. 1/n^2<1/n also, but 1/n^2 converges. Can you think of an upper bound comparison that converges?
 
Okay I got (2), (thanks for the correction), by comparing (2) to [tex]\frac{\sqrt{n}}{n^2}=\frac{1}{n^\frac{3}{2}}[/tex] which converges (p-series w/ p>1), therefore (2) converges. Is this correct?

As for (1) I wrote out the terms and discovered it is an alternating series with the even terms all equal to 0 as follows:

1-1/3+1/5-1/7+...

I can't seem to write a series to satisfy the requirements however...any guidance would be appreciated.
 
malindenmoyer said:
Okay I got (2), (thanks for the correction), by comparing (2) to [tex]\frac{\sqrt{n}}{n^2}=\frac{1}{n^\frac{3}{2}}[/tex] which converges (p-series w/ p>1), therefore (2) converges. Is this correct?

As for (1) I wrote out the terms and discovered it is an alternating series with the even terms all equal to 0 as follows:

1-1/3+1/5-1/7+...

I can't seem to write a series to satisfy the requirements however...any guidance would be appreciated.

Yes, that's right for (2). For (1) you have an alternating series with decreasing terms. How about the alternating series test?
 
Yea I figured it had to do with that.

If we define the alternating series to be: [tex]\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n-1}b_n[/tex]

then I can't seem to determine a [tex]b_n[/tex] which defines the series for all n, especially since every odd [tex]n[/tex] changes sign and all the even [tex]n[/tex]'s are 0...I must be missing something...
 
malindenmoyer said:
Yea I figured it had to do with that.

If we define the alternating series to be: [tex]\Sigma_{n=1}^{\infty} (-1)^{n-1}b_n[/tex]

then I can't seem to determine a [tex]b_n[/tex] which defines the series for all n, especially since every odd [tex]n[/tex] changes sign and all the even [tex]n[/tex]'s are 0...I must be missing something...

Your original series is not strictly an alternating series, true. But just throw out the zero terms. That makes your series equal to (-1)^(n-1)/(2n-1), right?
 
Ah, the something I was missing was the fact that we were not explicitly using the values in the original series, which was confusing me. Instead we just defined a completely new series whose sum is equivalent to the old one. Thank you so much for finally making that clear...I should have known but was just caught up in finding something that worked! Many thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K