Series solution about a regular singular point (x=0) of xy''-xy'-y=0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation xy'' - xy' - y = 0 around the regular singular point x = 0. The indicial equation yields roots r = 0 and r = 1, leading to two series solutions. The first series solution is incorrectly concluded as y1 = Co(1 + x + x²/2! + x³/3!...), which does not satisfy the original equation. The second solution requires a different approach due to the integer difference between the roots.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series solutions for differential equations
  • Familiarity with indicial equations and recurrence relations
  • Knowledge of power series and their convergence
  • Proficiency in manipulating differential equations in standard form
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of Frobenius for solving differential equations
  • Learn about the Wronskian to find independent solutions
  • Explore the concept of regular singular points in differential equations
  • Investigate alternative methods for obtaining second solutions when roots differ by an integer
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations and series solutions, as well as researchers exploring advanced mathematical techniques in applied mathematics.

Pinedas42
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the indicial equation and find 2 independent series solutions for the DE:
xy''-xy'-y=0 about the regular singular point x=0


Homework Equations


y=Ʃ(0→∞) Cnxn+r
y'=Ʃ(0→∞) Cn(n+r)xn+r-1
y''=Ʃ(0→∞) Cn(n+r)(n+r-1)xn+r-2


The Attempt at a Solution


Finding the indicial eq.
Stan. form y''-y'-(1/x)y=0

p(x)=x*(-1)=-x
q(x)=x2*(-1/x)=-x

Making ao and bo both zero for

r(r-1)+aor+bo=0

so r=0,1

Solving for the equation I finish with (I'll skip a few steps, confident in this portion)

Cor(r-1)xr-1+Ʃ(0→∞) [Cn+1(n+r+1)(n+r)-Cn(n+r+1)]xn+r

Inside the brackets = 0 so the recurrence relation is

Cn=Cn+1(n+r) , n=0,1,2,3...

For r=1, Cn=Cn+1(n+1)

Co=C1, n=0
C1=C2(2)=Co/2, n=1
C2=C3(3)=Co/2*3, n=2
C3=C4(4)=Co/2*3*4, n=3

I conclude y1=Co(1+x+x2/2!+x3/3!...)
which is the series for ex, though our professor wants this in series form.

For r=0, Cn=Cn+1(n)

Co=0, n=0
C1=C2, n=1
C2=C3(2)=C1/2, n=2
C3=C4(3)=C1/2*3, n=3

I'm not to sure how put this into summing terms, the zero is throwing me off.
I'd like to know if I'm on the right track with this. I feel like I did everything as I was supposed to, but something is giving me gut feeling that some portion is erroneous.

Thanks for the help, if you choose to lend it to this tedious problem lol :zzz:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bumpity. Does anyone even have perhaps a hint that something is wrong?
 
Pinedas42 said:

Homework Statement


Find the indicial equation and find 2 independent series solutions for the DE:
xy''-xy'-y=0 about the regular singular point x=0

Homework Equations


y=Ʃ(0→∞) Cnxn+r
y'=Ʃ(0→∞) Cn(n+r)xn+r-1
y''=Ʃ(0→∞) Cn(n+r)(n+r-1)xn+r-2

The Attempt at a Solution


Finding the indicial eq.
Stan. form y''-y'-(1/x)y=0

p(x)=x*(-1)=-x
q(x)=x2*(-1/x)=-x

Making ao and bo both zero for

r(r-1)+aor+bo=0

so r=0,1

Solving for the equation I finish with (I'll skip a few steps, confident in this portion)

Cor(r-1)xr-1+Ʃ(0→∞) [Cn+1(n+r+1)(n+r)-Cn(n+r+1)]xn+r

Inside the brackets = 0 so the recurrence relation is

Cn=Cn+1(n+r) , n=0,1,2,3...

For r=1, Cn=Cn+1(n+1)

Co=C1, n=0
C1=C2(2)=Co/2, n=1
C2=C3(3)=Co/2*3, n=2
C3=C4(4)=Co/2*3*4, n=3

I conclude y1=Co(1+x+x2/2!+x3/3!...)
which is the series for ex, though our professor wants this in series form.
Your conclusion is wrong. You can see this if you plug ex into the original differential equation. It's not a solution. Remember you're working on the case where r=1. What's the power of x in the lowest-order term?

For r=0, Cn=Cn+1(n)

Co=0, n=0
C1=C2, n=1
C2=C3(2)=C1/2, n=2
C3=C4(3)=C1/2*3, n=3

I'm not to sure how put this into summing terms, the zero is throwing me off.
I'd like to know if I'm on the right track with this. I feel like I did everything as I was supposed to, but something is giving me gut feeling that some portion is erroneous.
C0 can't be equal to 0. By definition, it's the coefficient of the lowest-order non-vanishing term. Because the two values of r differ by an integer, this method won't give you a second independent solution. You'll have to find the second solution another way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K