Series Solution to Linear Equations: Finding the Expansion for the Term xy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a series expansion for the term xy in the context of linear equations. Participants are exploring the implications of differentiating series and how to appropriately handle index shifts when multiplying by x.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the series representation of y and the effects of differentiation on the series terms. There is a focus on whether multiplying by x necessitates an index shift and how to align terms for addition of series.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the handling of series and index shifts, suggesting that in certain cases, such as multiplying by x, the index does not need to be shifted. Others are considering writing out terms to clarify their understanding of indexing.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the importance of correctly indexing series when performing operations like differentiation and multiplication, and participants are reflecting on the role of arbitrary constants in series expansions.

WatermelonPig
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I just can't figure out this one term in the series. For a linear equation, one of the the terms is xy. So I need to find a series expansion of this starting at n = 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume y = sum(anx^n) n = 0
dy/dx = sum(nanx^(n-1)) n = 1
x(dy/dx) = sum(nanx^n) n = 1
Shifting indexes:
x(dy/dx) = sum((n+1)anx^(n+1)) n = 0
But the solution says:
x(dy/dx) = sum(anx^n) n = 0
So by multiplying the x in does that already shift the index?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WatermelonPig said:

Homework Statement


I just can't figure out this one term in the series. For a linear equation, one of the the terms is xy. So I need to find a series expansion of this starting at n = 0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume y = sum(anx^n) n = 0
dy/dx = sum(nanx^(n-1)) n = 1
x(dy/dx) = sum(nanx^n) n = 1
Shifting indexes:
x(dy/dx) = sum((n+1)anx^(n+1)) n = 0
But the solution says:
x(dy/dx) = sum(anx^n) n = 0
So by multiplying the x in does that already shift the index?

When you plug a series

y = Σanxn

into a DE, as you have noticed, differentiating it reduces the exponent:

y' = Σnanxn-1

If you were calculating, for example, y' + y and you add these two series, it is convenient to shift the index on the second series so they are both expressed in terms of xn. That makes it easy to collect terms and figure out any recursion formula.

In your example, multiplying y' by x gives:

xy' = Σnanxn

so you don't need to shift the index. Circumstances have already given you xn for your general term. The same thing would happen if y'' was multiplied by x2. But any other power would require shifting the exponent to get xn as the general term.
 
Ok, that makes sense. I guess I'lll write out the first few terms from now before deciding on indexing.
 
WatermelonPig said:
Ok, that makes sense. I guess I'lll write out the first few terms from now before deciding on indexing.

Just index each sum to give xn. Any extra terms at the beginning of a sum are usually where the arbitrary constants come from.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K