Series test for convergence or divergence

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series $$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2n+1}$$ is divergent, contrary to initial assumptions based on the comparison test with $$\frac{1}{2n}$$. The correct application of the comparison test shows that $$\frac{1}{2n+1} \geq \frac{1}{4n}$$, which relates to the harmonic series, confirming divergence. Additionally, while the limit of the summands approaches zero, this does not guarantee convergence, as demonstrated by the harmonic series counterexample.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence tests, specifically the comparison test.
  • Familiarity with the harmonic series and its properties.
  • Knowledge of limits and their implications in series analysis.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the harmonic series and its divergence.
  • Learn about the Limit Comparison Test and its applications.
  • Explore other convergence tests, such as the Ratio Test and Root Test.
  • Practice writing mathematical expressions in LaTeX for clarity in presentations.
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematicians, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of series convergence and divergence, as well as those needing assistance with LaTeX formatting.

Duane
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I had a bit of trouble in testing series like this for convergence
$$\sum_{ n=1 }^{ \infty } \frac { 1 }{ 2n+1 } $$
If by the comparison test, ##\frac{ 1 }{ 2n+1 } < \frac{ 1 }{ 2n }## for all of n>0,
and ##\lim_{ n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{ 1 }{ 2n }## =0, then the series should be convergent.
However, the correct answer in my book is divergent.
Why is that so?

Thanks for any help

PS. Could anyone help me with the LaTeX code? I can't seem to get it right.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Duane said:
I had a bit of trouble in testing series like this for convergence
[tеx]\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2n+1}[/tеx]If by the comparison test, [tеx]\frac{1}{2n+1} < \frac{1}{2n}[/tеx] for all of n>0,
and [tеx]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}\frac {1}{2n}=0[/tеx], then the series should be convergent.
However, the correct answer in my book is divergent.
Why is that so?

Thanks for any help

PS. Could anyone help me with the LaTeX code? I can't seem to get it right.


I tried to edit your post but for some reason it keeps on coming up messed down...

Anyway, the comparison test works this time THE OTHER way:

\frac{1}{2n+1}\geq\frac{1}{2n+2n}=\frac{1}{4}\frac{1}{n} and since the rightmost sequence gives us the harmonic series times one fourth, it is divergent and thus is our series.

DonAntonio
 
Yes, Don Antonio nailed it, but how should we recognize whether a series is convergent and divergent? Sometimes you can see it a little faster by recognizing the limiting behavior of the summands. For n large, you're summands will head toward \frac{1}{2n}. This could suggest to us quickly that it might diverge. (As always, still have to check by proving.)

Also, the problem with your proof. Pet P be the statement that a series converges, and let Q be the statement that the summands go to zero. So yes, P implies Q. But Q does not imply P, there are counterexamples, such as the harmonic series, which you discovered in a frustrating way.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K