Set Theory Basic Proof, showing two sets are equal

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on proving the equality of two sets in set theory: A = {x ∈ Z | for an integer y, x = 6y} and B = {x ∈ Z | for integers u and v, x = 2u and x = 3v}. The key conclusion is that to demonstrate A = B, one must show both A ⊆ B and B ⊆ A. The discussion emphasizes using definitions directly from set theory to construct proofs, particularly the importance of establishing membership in both sets through logical reasoning.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic set theory concepts, including set notation and membership.
  • Familiarity with integer properties and definitions, particularly regarding multiples.
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof techniques, specifically direct proofs.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic expressions involving integers.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions of subset and equality in set theory.
  • Learn about the properties of integers, particularly the concept of coprime numbers.
  • Practice writing direct proofs in set theory with various examples.
  • Explore more complex proofs involving set operations and relations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators teaching set theory, and anyone interested in enhancing their proof-writing skills in mathematical contexts.

LawdyLawdy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am trying to teach myself set theory...main problem is, as an engineer, mathematical proofs were never exactly stressed in my curriculum. (Scary, right?)

The problem is stated as follows:

"Prove the following,
{x\inZ|for an integer y, x=6y}={x\inZ|for integers u and v, x=2u and x=3v}"

Z is the set of all integers.
(let's call the left side of the equation set A and the right side set B)
I can't seem to get my head around the "prose" of proofs.

I understand in order to prove a set A is equivalent to set B I need to show they have the exact same members ( A\subseteqB and B\subseteqA )
I also realize that if x=6y is in A then x=2(3y) and x=3(2y) is in B if you consider 3y and 2y the integers u and v, respectively.

I guess my question would be how to write it in an "acceptable" way and if the way I am going is the correct direction.(that is important too I suppose :p )

Apologies if this is a bit cluttered, this is my first time posting a math question on a forum and am working on getting the hang of it. Thanks in advance though for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LawdyLawdy said:
Hello,
I am trying to teach myself set theory...main problem is, as an engineer, mathematical proofs were never exactly stressed in my curriculum. (Scary, right?)

The problem is stated as follows:

"Prove the following,
{x\inZ|for an integer y, x=6y}={x\inZ|for integers u and v, x=2u and x=3v}"

Z is the set of all integers.
(let's call the left side of the equation set A and the right side set B)
I can't seem to get my head around the "prose" of proofs.

I understand in order to prove a set A is equivalent to set B I need to show they have the exact same members ( A\subseteqB and B\subseteqA )
I also realize that if x=6y is in A then x=2(3y) and x=3(2y) is in B if you consider 3y and 2y the integers u and v, respectively.

I guess my question would be how to write it in an "acceptable" way and if the way I am going is the correct direction.(that is important too I suppose :p )

Apologies if this is a bit cluttered, this is my first time posting a math question on a forum and am working on getting the hang of it. Thanks in advance though for any help.

As you point out, you need to show that

A\subseteq B and B\subseteq A

So you need to show two separate things.

To show that A\subseteq B, you go to directly to the set theory definition of A\subseteq B; which is:

For all x, if x \in A then x \in B

So assume x is in A, and show that it must be in B; and then assume x is in B, and show it must be in A.

In general, it's always helpful to go directly to the texbook definitions, rather than trying to overthink the problem. In other words we have an intuitive idea of what A\subseteq B means, but it's more effective to go directly to the definition. This is a common pattern in doing proofs.

Re-reading your post, it looks like you're going in the right direction.
 
Last edited:
LawdyLawdy said:
Hello,
I am trying to teach myself set theory...main problem is, as an engineer, mathematical proofs were never exactly stressed in my curriculum. (Scary, right?)

The problem is stated as follows:

"Prove the following,
{x\inZ|for an integer y, x=6y}={x\inZ|for integers u and v, x=2u and x=3v}"

Z is the set of all integers.
(let's call the left side of the equation set A and the right side set B)
I can't seem to get my head around the "prose" of proofs.

I understand in order to prove a set A is equivalent to set B I need to show they have the exact same members ( A\subseteqB and B\subseteqA )
I also realize that if x=6y is in A then x=2(3y) and x=3(2y) is in B if you consider 3y and 2y the integers u and v, respectively.

I guess my question would be how to write it in an "acceptable" way and if the way I am going is the correct direction.(that is important too I suppose :p )

Apologies if this is a bit cluttered, this is my first time posting a math question on a forum and am working on getting the hang of it. Thanks in advance though for any help.
Yes, you are correct. To prove A= B, for sets, prove both A\subseteq B and B\subseteq A. And to prove each of those, start "if p\in A" and use the properties of both A and B to show "therefore p\in B"

Let A= {x\inZ|for an integer y, x=6y} and B={x\inZ|for integers u and v, x=2u and x=3v}. If p\in A then x= 6y for some y. Let u= 3y and v= 2y. Then x= 6y= 2(3y)= 2u and x= 6y= 3(2y)= 3v. Therefore p\in B so A\subset B. Now do the other way. That's slightly harder. You will need to use the fact that 2 and 3 are mutually prime.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K