Shaft and Torque Calculations with Mass

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculations of torque and force related to a motor-driven shaft with an attached screw used for mixing a product, specifically focusing on the role of the shaft's mass and the forces exerted by the product being mixed. The scope includes theoretical considerations, practical applications, and the complexities of fluid dynamics in mixing processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the mass of the shaft is not significant once it is rotating at a constant speed, as it has stored kinetic energy and requires no additional energy to maintain that speed.
  • Others argue that the energy required for mixing depends on the flow characteristics of the product, such as whether it is a Newtonian or Non-Newtonian fluid, and the geometry of the screw.
  • A participant suggests calculating the force exerted by the product based on the energy flow needed for mixing, which involves lifting mass or circulating a viscous fluid.
  • Another participant mentions the importance of grain friction against the auger screw and the need to consider the geometry and pitch of the auger when moving grain.
  • Some participants discuss the energy input requirements based on the height the grain is lifted and the mass flow rate, indicating that friction and pressure also play significant roles.
  • A later reply questions the assumption that no energy is needed to keep the screw rotating while it is displacing material, prompting clarification that energy is only needed for the material being moved.
  • One participant describes a method for calculating work done based on the weight of grain moved and the vertical distance, while noting the complexity of accounting for friction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the shaft's mass during operation and the energy requirements for mixing. There is no consensus on the best approach to calculate the forces involved or the impact of fluid characteristics on the mixing process.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unspecified parameters related to material properties, flow rates, and the complexities of friction in the mixing process. The discussion also highlights the need for empirical measurements to address certain calculations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mechanical engineering, fluid dynamics, and applications involving mixing processes, particularly those involving augers and the movement of granular materials.

Mechaman
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Suppose I have a motor driving a shaft that runs 1.5m long with a screw attached, the screw is mixing a product.

Power = Torque x Speed
Torque = Power/Speed

To find my Torque I can use my Shear Max = Tr/J
And J for a shaft is Tmax = (π / 16) τmax D3

My question is, where does the mass of the shaft itself come into the formula? And How would I calculate the force the product is causing on the screw attached to the shaft?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Mechaman said:
My question is, where does the mass of the shaft itself come into the formula?
Once the shaft and screw mass is rotating it has stored kinetic energy. It takes no energy to keep it rotating at that fixed speed. So mass is not important once it is running, only during acceleration.

Mechaman said:
How would I calculate the force the product is causing on the screw attached to the shaft?
That will depend on the flow of the product. Mixing usually involves lifting material and dropping it again, or causing a circular flow with eddies that causes the mixing. In either case energy is needed to lift mass or circulate a viscous fluid. Once you know the energy flow needed to carry out the mixing process, you can calculate the power and so the torque on the shaft. The forces on the screw will be dependent on screw geometry. But you know the total energy flow rate = power and so can distribute that energy flow over the area of screw in contact with the product.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mechaman
Baluncore said:
Once the shaft and screw mass is rotating it has stored kinetic energy. It takes no energy to keep it rotating at that fixed speed. So mass is not important once it is running, only during acceleration.That will depend on the flow of the product. Mixing usually involves lifting material and dropping it again, or causing a circular flow with eddies that causes the mixing. In either case energy is needed to lift mass or circulate a viscous fluid. Once you know the energy flow needed to carry out the mixing process, you can calculate the power and so the torque on the shaft. The forces on the screw will be dependent on screw geometry. But you know the total energy flow rate = power and so can distribute that energy flow over the area of screw in contact with the product.

Thanks for clearing that up, makes a lot of sense about the shaft already running. I suppose getting it to that running speed shouldn't be a problem in most situations.
 
That depends on whether your product is a Newtonian or Non-Newtonian fluid.
 
JBA said:
That depends on whether your product is a Newtonian or Non-Newtonian fluid.
It's actually a grain that I'm looking to move with an auger, would an approach like, how much weight grain is per meter and then how much flighting on the screw is in contact with the grain?
 
Thank goodness you are not mixing a non-Newtonian cornflower custard. I was thinking mixing material in an open chamber, but if you are moving a flowing material like grain with an auger, then it will be the mass flow and the change in height that will dictate the energy input requirement. Will the transfer be horizontal ?

There will also be a matter of grain friction against the rotating auger screw. You might consider the bottom half of the space between two turns of the auger as a pocket that is filled with grain. There will be a boundary layer of grain between the auger and auger casing. Steeper augers need closer pitch turns as only a small cylindrical wedge of grain can be moved in each pocket.
 
If possible I would try measuring the torque required.

Is the grain discharged at the top of the auger or does it continue up a pipe?
 
Hi, sorry for getting in the middle of the topic. I just found it interesting. And I have a question.

Baluncore said:
Once the shaft and screw mass is rotating it has stored kinetic energy. It takes no energy to keep it rotating at that fixed speed. So mass is not important once it is running, only during acceleration.

Why doesn't it require energy to keep the screw rotating if the screw is displacing material in a circular motion and therefore doing work?
 
Guidestone; welcome to the thread.
Guidestone said:
Why doesn't it require energy to keep the screw rotating if the screw is displacing material in a circular motion and therefore doing work?
Because the OP question was in two distinct parts and the answer was in two parts. You have only read one.
Mechaman said:
My question is, where does the mass of the shaft itself come into the formula? And How would I calculate the force the product is causing on the screw attached to the shaft?
Without material to mix or move, no energy is needed to keep the shaft and screw rotating.
The energy needed to mix or move the material is dependent on many other unspecified material and flow rate parameters.
 
  • #10
OK, so here's what I'm imagining you're working with, but instead of transferring grain from one place to another, you're putting it back into the same container, eventually mixing it.
SP-Auger-570x380-pixels.jpg


The way I'd approach the problem is in 2 parts.. One is how high you're lifting the grain in total, The length of the auger is of little relevance here, but it's displacement per turn is.. Let's say it moves 10kg per revolution and moves it 1m vertically (though it may take 30 turns to get a particular kernel to the top), you can find the work it takes (10 * 9.8 * 1 = 98NM per turn).
The second part is a lot harder.. Friction will be a function of how much grain is on top of the auger (downward pressure) and the total area of the auger exposed to it.. I'm not quite sure how you'd go about the details of that though other than empirical measurements.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
58
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K