Shared partition for music? (Windows/Linux)

  • Thread starter Thread starter JesseC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Music Partition
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the best methods for sharing a music collection between Ubuntu and Windows operating systems. Participants explore various approaches, including partitioning strategies, external hard drives, and network sharing, while considering the implications of file system compatibility and data integrity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests partitioning the hard drive into separate sections for Ubuntu, Windows, and shared data, questioning if software exists to manage changes across both systems without issues.
  • Another participant proposes using an external hard drive for mobility, but expresses concern about complicating backup processes if the drive is repurposed for music storage.
  • There is a mention that Ubuntu can mount Windows file systems, raising questions about the safety of allowing Ubuntu software to read and write to a Windows partition.
  • A suggestion is made to mount the Windows partition as read-only to mitigate risks, with a participant considering using command line music players that do not create additional metadata files.
  • One participant shares their experience with VLC player and notes that metadata is typically stored in the home directory on Linux, which may alleviate concerns about data management.
  • A different approach is discussed where participants consider networking two computers to share files, detailing how to set up IP addresses for seamless access between systems.
  • Another participant describes their own partition setup, emphasizing the safety of keeping the Windows partition unmounted while allowing full access to a separate data partition formatted in NTFS.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of opinions on the best method for sharing music files, with no consensus reached. Some favor partitioning strategies, while others suggest external drives or networking solutions. Concerns about data integrity and file system compatibility are also debated.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various technical details, such as file system types (NTFS, EXT3) and the potential for automatic mounting in Ubuntu, but these points remain contingent on individual setups and preferences.

JesseC
Messages
247
Reaction score
2
I have a moderately sized music collection of 76GB which I would like to access from both ubuntu and windows. What is the best way to do this?

My thoughts were... have ubuntu on one partition, windows on a second, and stick shared stuff in a third one. Is there software for both ubuntu and windows that could then access the music without messing it up or getting confused when something is changed from the other operating system?

Or is there perhaps a better way?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Greg Bernhardt said:
It might be easier to just use an external HD. It's obviously mobile that way too.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822148653

That also occurred to me, however, I currently use my ext HD for backup and if I were to put my music on it then I'd have to use my computer HD to back up the music. I am trying to avoid making the backup situation too complicated.
 
Last I checked Ubuntu had no problem mounting a windows file system...
 
DavidSnider said:
Last I checked Ubuntu had no problem mounting a windows file system...

Wouldn't that mean letting Ubuntu music software read and write to my Windows partition? Is that a good idea...
 
JesseC said:
Wouldn't that mean letting Ubuntu music software read and write to my Windows partition? Is that a good idea...

You could mount it as read only if that is a concern. Reading data shouldn't do any harm.
 
DavidSnider said:
You could mount it as read only if that is a concern. Reading data shouldn't do any harm.

That sounds like a good idea. A thought just occurred to me, I could do what you suggest and use a simple command line music player which wouldn't need to create library files and all the other hidden meta data stuff. Google suggests cmus or mplayer, any experience with these?
 
I usually use VLC player for everything, but there are a lot of good choices out there. The meta data shouldn't be a problem, it usually gets written in your home directory on linux anyway.
 
If its dual boot, all of the suggestions above are correct, if they are separate computers you could either share it from one computer to the other or get a third computer running as a server to share the files, the simple way to go is to just network the two setting their ip addresses manually, linux will be able to see all the shared items on a windows network without any hassles as long as they are both in the same subnet.
for example

Windows PC
Ip address: 192.168.0.2
subnet: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.1

Linux PC
Ip address: 192.168.0.3
subnet: 255.255.255.0
Gateway: 192.168.0.1
 
  • #10
My computer is set up in three partitions:

1. Windows OS, and all installed Windows programs (80GB NTFS)

2. Ubuntu OS, and all installed Linux programs (80GB EXT3)

3. "Data" partition containing all documents (340GB NTFS)

I think it's safer this way, because then Ubuntu never has to mount the Windows partition. I can mount the Data partition with full read/write permissions and never have to worry about messing up Windows. Ubuntu deals with the NTFS structure just fine. I get access to all the same documents, regardless of which OS I boot.

You can even configure Ubuntu to automatically mount the Data partition on startup by editing your

/etc/fstab

file. Use Google to find detailed instructions, I can't remember everything exactly. With automounting, the whole thing becomes a seamless experience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K