Sherrigton-Kirkpatrick model for spin glass question

  • Thread starter Thread starter svletana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Glass Model Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model for spin glasses as presented in the 1975 paper by Sherrington. The user is attempting to derive the average free energy expression, F_{av}, and is struggling with the transition from their derived equation to the one presented in the paper, specifically regarding the treatment of terms in the thermodynamic limit. Key equations discussed include the intensive forms of J_0 and J^2, and the identities for summing over spins. The user seeks clarification on the missing steps that lead to the discrepancy in the exponent terms of their derived expression versus the original paper.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model for spin glasses
  • Familiarity with statistical mechanics concepts, particularly free energy
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic limits in statistical physics
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of summations and limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the average free energy in the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model
  • Study the implications of thermodynamic limits on statistical mechanics equations
  • Examine the identities used for summing spin variables in statistical physics
  • Learn about the role of intensive versus extensive variables in thermodynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in theoretical physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics and spin glass theory, will benefit from this discussion. Additionally, mathematicians interested in the applications of these concepts in complex systems will find the insights valuable.

svletana
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
I'm having some trouble understanding some of the steps done in the uploaded paper. I'ts the 1975 paper by Sherrington where they explain the SK model for spin glass.

Homework Statement

and

Homework Equations

[/B]
Up to equation 5 I understand all steps. I used J_0 = J_0 / N and J^2 = J^2 / \sqrt[]{N} so they are intensive.
I have arrived at the following expression, similar to the one in the paper:

<br /> F_{av} = - k_B T \lim_{n \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{n} \left[<br /> Tr_{s_i} \exp \left( \sum_{i \neq j} \sum_{\alpha = 1}^{n} \frac{\beta}{2} J_0 s_i^{\alpha} s_j^{\alpha} + \sum_{i \neq j} \sum_{\alpha, \gamma = 1}^n \frac{\beta^2 J^2 s_i^{\alpha} s_j^{\alpha} s_i^{\gamma} s_j^{\gamma}}{8} \right)<br /> - 1 \right]<br />

Afterwards I asume they use the identities

\sum_{i \neq j} s_i^{\alpha} s_j^{\alpha} = \frac{1}{2} \left[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^N s_i^{\alpha} \right)^2 - N \right]

\sum_{i \neq j} s_i^{\alpha} s_j^{\alpha} s_i^{\gamma} s_j^{\gamma} = \frac{1}{2} \left[ \left(\sum_{i=1}^N s_i^{\alpha} s_i^{\gamma} \right)^2 - N \right]

It's the next step I'm having trouble with (equation 6).

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, I don't understand what terms they are dropping. It says something vanishes in the thermodynamic limit but I'm not sure what it is.
If I factor out some terms I get this:

<br /> F_{av} = - k_B T \lim_{n \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{n} \left\{<br /> Tr_{s_i} \exp\left( -\frac{N n \beta^2 J^2}{4} \right) \exp \left[<br /> \sum_{\alpha} \frac{J_0 \beta}{4} \left( \sum_i s_i^{\alpha} \right)^2 +<br /> \sum_{\alpha, \gamma} \frac{\beta^2 J^2}{8} \left( \sum_i s_i^{\alpha} s_j^{\gamma} \right)^2<br /> \right]<br /> -1\right\}<br />which is a little different from what they got, which is:

<br /> F_{av} = - k_B T \lim_{n \rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{n} \left\{<br /> Tr_{s_i} \exp\left( \frac{N n \beta^2 J^2}{4} \right) \exp \left[<br /> \sum_{\alpha} \frac{J_0 \beta}{2} \left( \sum_i s_i^{\alpha} \right)^2 +<br /> \sum_{\alpha, \gamma} \frac{\beta^2 J^2}{2} \left( \sum_i s_i^{\alpha} s_j^{\gamma} \right)^2<br /> \right]<br /> -1\right\}<br />

What steps am I missing?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
How do I get to the expression they got?The main difference is that in my expression there are exponents of -Nn\beta^2J^2/4 and in theirs there is +Nn\beta^2J^2/4. I'm not sure where this comes from.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K