Shielding behavior of a steel cuboid in a DC magnetic field

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter thinksolid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet field Shielding
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the magnetic shielding behavior of a rectangular steel cuboid in a homogeneous DC magnetic field of 100 mT. When oriented with the long side perpendicular to the field, the internal magnetic field drops to approximately 20 mT, while the short side orientation results in an internal field of 40 mT. This counterintuitive result is attributed to increased reluctance due to the longer flux path in the steel, which diminishes the shielding effectiveness. A suggested solution is to thicken the long-side walls to enhance shielding performance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields and shielding principles
  • Familiarity with steel properties and magnetic permeability
  • Knowledge of reluctance and its impact on magnetic circuits
  • Experience with simulation tools for magnetic field analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of wall thickness on magnetic shielding effectiveness
  • Explore simulation software for magnetic field analysis, such as COMSOL Multiphysics
  • Study the relationship between reluctance and magnetic flux in materials
  • Investigate alternative materials for improved magnetic shielding
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, physicists, and researchers involved in magnetic shielding design, particularly those working with steel enclosures in electromagnetic applications.

thinksolid
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Simulating a steel shielding box in a 100 mT DC magnetic field shows counterintuitive results depending on orientation. I'm trying to understand why less magnetic field penetrates the shorter side of the cuboid.
Hello everyone,

I'm currently working on simulating magnetic shielding.
The shielding enclosure is a rectangular steel box placed in a homogeneous DC magnetic field of 100 mT in air.
The steel box has a wall thickness of 3 mm on every side. The inside is filled with air.


Here’s the issue:
  • When the box is oriented with its long side perpendicular to the magnetic field, the internal field drops to around 20 mT.
  • When the short side is perpendicular to the field, the internal field rises to 40 mT.

This result is the opposite of what I expected. I assumed that having the long side perpendicular to the field would couple more magnetic flux into the material, pushing the shielding closer to saturation and thus allowing more field to penetrate into the interior.


Why is my assumption incorrect? Measurements of the box in realiy showed the same result.


Any insights would be appreciated!

1752138025035.webp

Arrows indicate the direction of the external magnetic field.
(~20 mT max. inside)

1752138098210.webp

(~40 mT max. inside)

1752138139674.gif

Simulation environment, external field in green
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
thinksolid said:
Why is my assumption incorrect?
I suspect that the longer flux path increases the reluctance, so reduces the shielding.
Try thickening the long-side walls proportionally, to compensate for the increased length.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DaveE and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K