SHM - Pendulum and Mass on a spring

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaye
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the periods of a pendulum and a mass on a spring, expressed mathematically. The user presents an equation that equates the two periods, simplifying it to show that the pendulum's period is twice that of the spring's mass. There is confusion about how to proceed with the calculations after squaring both sides of the equation. A suggestion is made to use different symbols for the variables to clarify the relationship and to take ratios for the periods, which can help in simplifying the analysis. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clear notation and proper mathematical manipulation in solving the problem.
Shaye
Messages
20
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
The time period of oscillation of a simple pendulum of length l is the same as the time period of oscillation of a mass M attached to a vertical spring. The length and mass are then changed. Which row, A to D (see attachment), in the table would give a simple pendulum with a time period twice that of the spring oscillations?
Relevant Equations
T = 2π√(l/g): Mass on a pendulum
T = 2π√(m/k): Mass on a spring
I have only be able to write something like:

2x(2π√(l/g)) = 2π√(m/k)
2π is a constant therefore; 2x(√(l/g)) = √(m/k)
You could square both sides; 2^2x(l/g) = (m/k)

But now I'm lost as to how to proceed.

PS- Book answer is B

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 2023-07-25 19 20 39.png
    2023-07-25 19 20 39.png
    49 KB · Views: 91
Physics news on Phys.org
Shaye said:
2x(2π√(l/g)) = 2π√(m/k)
Does this look right to you? It says
2*(Pendulum period) = (Spring mass period)
If a father's age is twice that of his son's age, would you write
2*(father' age) = (son's age) ?

Aside from that, I would recommend that you write the new periods using different symbols for the changed length and mass and then take ratios for the periods cancelling quantities that remain unchanged.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top