Shock absorber forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrguyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Deflection Gear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around testing the integrity of a skid landing gear after a fall from a height of 500 mm, focusing on the forces exerted by shock absorbers. The user calculated that each shock absorber must produce 7357.5 N to dampen the impact energy of 1.4715 J, but found discrepancies when considering collision forces. Participants suggest incorporating damping effects into the calculations and emphasize the need for a mechanical drawing to clarify the setup. The conversation also touches on the importance of accounting for both vertical and horizontal forces during landing, even though the user primarily considers vertical forces. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of dynamic versus static analysis in engineering applications.
mrguyman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone! There’s a problem that I can’t find an answer to. I need to test the integrity of a skid landing gear after a fall from 500 mm height.

For a better understanding I simplified forward crosstube and it looks as follows: there’s a horizontal beam of 1,5 m length supporting the mass of around 300 kg, on the edges to the beam there is a shock absorber perpendicularly attached on each side, they are seen here as springs. The shock absorbers should damp all the energy of impact, namely 1.471,5 J by moving its full length of 100 mm. In order to do it, each shock absorber produces 7357,5 N. I calculated it using: m*g*h=0,5*kx^2=0,5*F_Spring*x.

Even if I assume that the collision will be 0.1 s long from: F=m*delta(v)/delta(t), I get that force of collision is 9396 N, which is significantly lower than the force produced by both shock absorbers. This means that the bending moment with the shock absorbers is far bigger than without them, which makes no sense. I understand that it’s a dynamic problem and I try to solve it in a static way but it makes no sense to me.

I guess that all the force produced by the shock absorbers is going to the ground but I’m not sure. I need to find a deflection of the beam and the bending moment. The material is Aluminum.
Thank you for your help, it’s highly appreciated!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Do you have a sketch or mechanical drawing of the setup? That would help this discussion a lot. Use the "Attach files" link below the Edit window to upload the file(s).

Also, a skid landing gear is subjected to both vertical and horizontal forces when contacting the ground (assuming whatever vehicle it's attached to is moving forward as it lands). Is that part of your calculation somehow?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF.

Do you have a sketch or mechanical drawing of the setup? That would help this discussion a lot. Use the "Attach files" link below the Edit window to upload the file(s).

Also, a skid landing gear is subjected to both vertical and horizontal forces when contacting the ground (assuming whatever vehicle it's attached to is moving forward as it lands). Is that part of your calculation somehow?
Thank you for advice. The landing gear is meant for vertical landing so I’m only assuming vertical forces. Here’s the quick sketch

IMG_4891.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You should look at the harmonic oscillator to solve this problem.

Although you talk about shock absorbers - usually called dampers - you only refer to springs. You probably will have to include damping as well in your equation.

Here is a 5-min video to summarize your case:



The only difference would be that in your case you would have an initial velocity ##v_0## as well, found with ##mg\Delta h = \frac{1}{2}mv_0^2##, where ##\Delta h## is the vertical distance traveled by the fallen object before the landing gear hits the ground.

Of course, plenty of online solvers, like this one.
 
  • Like
Likes mrguyman and berkeman
I tend to think that conservation of momentum will apply in this case. Average spring force x stopping distance = falling velocity x mass of helicopter. The spring must be sufficient to stop the aircraft hitting the ground, and the damping must then be enough to provide critical damping so it does not rebound.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top