Should a Velocity vs. Height Graph for a Parachute Be Linear?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expected shape of a velocity vs. height graph for a parachute experiment. Participants confirm that the graph should exhibit a logarithmic curve rather than a linear relationship due to the influence of air resistance and terminal velocity. The use of the formula v = s/t without accounting for air drag leads to an anomalous linear graph. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for accurately interpreting the results of parachute experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly forces and motion.
  • Familiarity with the concept of terminal velocity.
  • Knowledge of graphing techniques and interpreting graph shapes.
  • Experience with experimental design and error analysis in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of terminal velocity and its impact on falling objects.
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on velocity calculations.
  • Study logarithmic functions and their applications in physics.
  • Explore experimental methods for measuring and graphing velocity in free fall.
USEFUL FOR

Students conducting physics experiments, educators teaching concepts of motion and forces, and anyone interested in the dynamics of parachute performance and air resistance effects.

smileandbehappy
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am currently doing my a-level coursework on Parachutes. I have got a set of results for my first parachute by dropping the parashute from a determined height and then timing how lond it takes to hit the ground, and thus using the v=s/t formula to calculate the average velocity.

My graph is pretty much linear! I was thinking that it would be curved - is my graph wrong?

I will attatch my graph - if it looks awful would someone be kind enough to tell/show me what it should look like (there was a lot of error in my experiment so this is why I am worrying, and I need an A)

Thank you very much.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
dude u are right the graph should be a log curve instead of y=x.However,u use v=s/t for ur graph.this means that u are not taking air drag into consideration so i think that should be the reason
 
semc said:
dude u are right the graph should be a log curve instead of y=x.However,u use v=s/t for ur graph.this means that u are not taking air drag into consideration so i think that should be the reason


I'm not quite sure I understnad what you are saying. So that I can try and explain this in my write up, would you please be kind enough to explain: 1) Why the graph should be a log curve? (an equation which indicates this would help a lot), 2) Why would me using the equation for average velocity lead to me gaining an anomalous graph, when what I wish to show is the average velocity again height?

Thanks again.
 
well i am not quite sure but i think u are trying to ask why the graph is a log graph but not y=x right?okay... let's say u drop a marble from the sky,the instant u release the marble,gravity will pull it down so it will accelerate down right?however there is also the air resistance which increases as velocity increases.so there will be a point where this drag balances the gravity pull meaning it does not accelerate anymore and this velocity is the terminal velocity.so you know why the velocity does not increase linearly now?
is that alright?
 
semc said:
well i am not quite sure but i think u are trying to ask why the graph is a log graph but not y=x right?okay... let's say u drop a marble from the sky,the instant u release the marble,gravity will pull it down so it will accelerate down right?however there is also the air resistance which increases as velocity increases.so there will be a point where this drag balances the gravity pull meaning it does not accelerate anymore and this velocity is the terminal velocity.so you know why the velocity does not increase linearly now?
is that alright?

Sorry, I obviously havn't explain myself very well. I just wanted someone to look at the graph and say if they thought it was the correct shape. However you are right in saying that after a certain height the graph should level of.
 
oh sry for saying so much then :-p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
497
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K