Should abortion be considered murder?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter misskitty
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on whether abortion should be classified as murder and the role of the federal government in regulating it. Participants express strong opinions, with some advocating for pro-choice perspectives, emphasizing personal autonomy and the complexities surrounding abortion, particularly in cases of rape or health risks. Others argue that if a fetus is considered a person, then abortion equates to murder. The conversation highlights the polarized views on abortion, with many participants acknowledging the need for nuanced discussions rather than strict categorization into pro-life or pro-choice camps.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the legal definitions surrounding abortion and personhood.
  • Familiarity with the ethical implications of reproductive rights.
  • Knowledge of the medical aspects of pregnancy and abortion procedures.
  • Awareness of the socio-political landscape regarding abortion laws in the United States.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the legal status of abortion in various states, focusing on recent changes and court rulings.
  • Explore the ethical frameworks surrounding reproductive rights and personhood debates.
  • Investigate the medical procedures and implications of abortion, including the morning-after pill (RU-486).
  • Examine public opinion trends on abortion, particularly in relation to cases of rape and maternal health risks.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for policymakers, legal professionals, healthcare providers, and individuals interested in understanding the complexities of abortion rights and the ethical considerations involved.

Are you Pro-Life or Pro-Choice?

  • Anti-Abortion

    Votes: 7 19.4%
  • Pro-choice

    Votes: 20 55.6%
  • Indifferent

    Votes: 1 2.8%
  • Depends on the situation

    Votes: 8 22.2%

  • Total voters
    36
  • Poll closed .
  • #211
Reshma said:
Misskitty, thank you for your support:smile:. The reason no one raises this issue is female foeticide campaigners are falsely labelled Pro-feminist even though their only motive here is to save the life of the innocent unborn foetus. Probably the international community is not so well aware of the vast gender differences existing in the societies of India, China etc. The societies here irrespective of whether they are illiterate, under-educated, highly educated, economically backward or forward prefer male children to females. Females here ALWAYS have a secondary status in all orders of life.


i find that sad but true... women are truly prejudiced in asian society ,even before birth.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #212
learningphysics said:
I agree with your point about the costs of vasectomies and tubal ligation.

However, I disagree that these options should be avoided just so that in the future, a couple can still have a child. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

What is more important?

That a couple suffer no incoveniences whatsoever: the expense of contraception, the discomfort of tubal ligation or vasectomies, losing the chance of having a child in the future (after vasectomy or tubal ligation), the frustration of no sex (abstinance).

Or that a possibly living human being is not killed?

Abstinance is ideally the best way to go to prevent unplanned pregnancies, however, the reality is, there are many people ruled by their biology. Perhaps you personally may be able to do this, many, and I mean many people cannot or will not choose this avenue. We were designed to have sex, desire sex and enjoy sex (at least most of us). This is why I feel contraception needs to be free, so people have no excuse not to use it and unplanned pregnancies do not happen. We have to deal with the reality of humanity in this situation over the ideals of it.
 
  • #213
look, if you have too much sex, that's your own fault, just because you want to screw everything dosn't mean you can kill living humans. the moral of the story, if you must have sex all the time, wear a condom
 
  • #214
1 said:
look, if you have too much sex, that's your own fault, just because you want to screw everything dosn't mean you can kill living humans. the moral of the story, if you must have sex all the time, wear a condom

Umm, a condom is not 100% protective. Furthur not about having too much sex or promiscuity. Even one sexual encounter is enough for pregnancy to occur, such as with rape victims.
 
  • #215
fifiki said:
Umm, a condom is not 100% protective. Furthur not about having too much sex or promiscuity. Even one sexual encounter is enough for pregnancy to occur, such as with rape victims.

Perfectly true, although the condom odds are much better than the Catholic church would have you believe. And condom for the guy, pill for the gal, produces truly impressive odds in favor of no unwanted aftereffects.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
11K
  • · Replies 74 ·
3
Replies
74
Views
10K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
993
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K