Should Algebra Be Required At Community Colleges?

  • Thread starter PhotonSSBM
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Algebra
  • Featured
In summary: It's from 2013, but the arguments are timeless.http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/06/education/06math.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0In summary, the chancellor of the California Community Colleges system believes that students who are not majoring in math or science should not have to take intermediate algebra to earn an associate degree. California has the largest community college system in the US, and what goes in California sometimes spreads across the country. What do you think?

What do you think should be done to address the problems of learning math at community colleges??

  • Do nothing. There is no problem.

    Votes: 25 44.6%
  • Change curriculum but still keep most of Algebra.

    Votes: 18 32.1%
  • Change the curriculum and remove most of Algebra.

    Votes: 2 3.6%
  • Remove all of Algebra and teach the basic necessities.

    Votes: 1 1.8%
  • Other

    Votes: 10 17.9%

  • Total voters
    56
  • #1
PhotonSSBM
Insights Author
154
59
http://physicstoday.scitation.org/do/10.1063/PT.6.3.20170728a/full/

The chancellor of the California Community Colleges system believes that students who are not majoring in math or science should not have to take intermediate algebra to earn an associate degree. California has the largest community college system in the US, and what goes in California sometimes spreads across the country. What do you think? Is algebra necessary for students who don't plan to pursue a career in the sciences? -Physics Today

As someone who tutors community college students frequently, this is something I don't really have a solid answer for. Most of the students who fail out of the school in my county is due to the math requirements, and severe lack of any foundation they received while they were in grade school. So from a pragmatic perspective, if you're not looking to major in fields related to science, I don't see much of a reason to force people down this tunnel of failure that weeds out more people from associates degree programs than introductory calculus does from engineering programs.

I propose this, condensing the requirements down for general degrees to one general education style class that covers arithmetic for basic accounting, reading and following plots (not creating them), how those plots can be abused to manipulate statistics, and incorporate how to use all of this in a spreadsheet to manage finances. I honestly believe these are the core things we should be teaching everyone in math, and going beyond this should be an option, not a mandate.

Most community college students I tutor are there because they had a pretty garbage life, and more often than not had a pretty garbage school district. Expecting a grown up to learn the math of grades 1-10 in a year and a half is something I have always believed to be ridiculous. It can be done, but more often than not it just doesn't happen. I believe for the community college program in this country to succeed in helping more students get out of poverty we at the very least need to rethink how we teach math. What I've outlined above is just an idea, I'd love to hear what you guys think, especially those of you who are involved with community colleges yourselves. I think even if you disagree with what I've written, most of you should at least agree that there's a problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Wilson Donald Rohan, Isaac0427 and Buzz Bloom
Science news on Phys.org
  • #2
It has been so many years for me. I had Algebra, Geometry, Trig and Calculus in High School, and I started with Calculus in college. What are the key topics for today's College Algebra?
 
  • #3
First comment: what is the point of an AA degree? Does it indicate mastery of content, or is it merely a piece of paper. If the former, removing content devalues it. If the latter, we should remove even more content, so everyone can get one.

Second comment: "We're never going to use this!" is an argument more appropriate for a fourth grader than the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges system. It's also an argument that can be applied to many places in an AA/AS program.

Third comment: if the problem they are trying to solve is that algebra is "a major barrier to students of color", isn't the solution to require it only for white students? And if you think my proposal is ridiculous and offensive, I'd ask you to reflect on why you think this is so, and how Mr. Oakley's proposal scores on the same scale.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes David Lewis, SciencewithDrJ, Amrator and 9 others
  • #4
Not every one needs a college degree in life. Community colleges seek to fulfill two roles, I think: (1) to serve as feeders into four year programs elsewhere, and (2) to provide job skills beyond a high school degree level. There is a degree of conflict between these two goals. If the first goal is to be met, even for those who will eventually be liberal arts majors at a four year school, the community colleges must continue to teach College Algebra as College Algebra. But that is little more than what should have been learned in high school algebra. So if they are to require any mathematical growth for community college students, all should take College Algebra without dilution.
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint, Evo and scottdave
  • #5
CC's and VoTech's train people to make a living. Lots of people need that these days.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom
  • #6
Noisy Rhysling said:
CC's and VoTech's train people to make a living. Lots of people need that these days.

That was my second point above, and I certainly agree. It just happens to be in conflict with the first point I raised.
 
  • #7
  • #8
Vanadium 50 said:
First comment: what is the point of an AA degree? Does it indicate mastery of content, or is it merely a piece of paper. If the former, removing content devalues it. If the latter, we should remove even more content, so everyone cvan get one.

Second comment: "We're never going to use this!" is an argument more appropriate for a fourth grader than the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges system. It's also an argument that can be applied to many places in an AA/AS program.

Third comment: if the problem they are trying to solve is that algebra is "a major barrier to students of color", isn't the solution to require it only for white students? And if you think my proposal is ridiculous and offensive, I'd ask you to reflect on why you think this is so, and how Mr. Oakley's proposal scores on the same scale.
/
Can you tell me what value is added to someone who wants to be a physical therapist by being able to reduce a rational expression? An argument can easily be made that everyone uses math regularly, it's the level of which we require math to be mastered that's the issue. But how does being able to reduce a rational expression add to the value of such degrees where, guess what, nobody cares what you got in a math class unless you failed it.

Edit: To summarize, why do we require such a high degree of mastery for math, and not say, Literature?
 
  • Like
Likes symbolipoint
  • #9
PhotonSSBM said:
Edit: To summarize, why do we require such a high degree of mastery for math, and not say, Literature?

This gets right to the heart of the question. The answer is because what mathematics teaches us about logical thinking. This is not to say that logic cannot be applied in literature, because it certainly can be done. But literature can also be studied on a non-logical basis, looking only at emotions and fuzzy thought. That last approach simply does not work for algebra.

Unfortunately, algebra can also be "practiced" to a limited degree with very little thought. If a student simply learns "When you see this sort of problem, you execute these steps to solve it," that has little or no value. But if the student learns to think about what he is doing, why this leads to the solution, then we have the value of algebra for the non-technical student.
 
  • Like
Likes I like Serena, vela, scottdave and 1 other person
  • #10
After just reading this part of the post, and no more yet, I have this opinion...
The chancellor of the California Community Colleges system believes that students who are not majoring in math or science should not have to take intermediate algebra to earn an associate degree. California has the largest community college system in the US, and what goes in California sometimes spreads across the country. What do you think? Is algebra necessary for students who don't plan to pursue a career in the sciences? -Physics Today
Intermediate Algebra, as the minimum, should be required for any student wishing to earn an Associate Degree of , I would like to say, ANY major, from a community college. Although recheck should be done, my understanding is that at least "College Algebra" is required; and some major fields require either "Finite Math" or "Intro. Statistics", and of course anyone aiming in STEM for a degree from community college has other or additional Mathematics requirements (like Calculus 1, 2, or also 3; and some parts of linear algebra or differential equations). The STEM students need the additional mathematics skills and concepts for some of their relevant courses.
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
First comment: what is the point of an AA degree? Does it indicate mastery of content, or is it merely a piece of paper. If the former, removing content devalues it. If the latter, we should remove even more content, so everyone cvan get one.

Second comment: "We're never going to use this!" is an argument more appropriate for a fourth grader than the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges system. It's also an argument that can be applied to many places in an AA/AS program.

Third comment: if the problem they are trying to solve is that algebra is "a major barrier to students of color", isn't the solution to require it only for white students? And if you think my proposal is ridiculous and offensive, I'd ask you to reflect on why you think this is so, and how Mr. Oakley's proposal scores on the same scale.
Keep the same standards for everyone, in order to support equality and justice. This includes the Mathematics requirements for the academic programs.

The question of "when or how will we ever use this?" is a ...not sure how to say... a poor question, because the schools, the teachers/professors, even the students themselves, are not yet in a field after graduating, to know what they will need to use nor when nor where they will need to use it. Prepare for MORE, and then PICK WHAT YOU NEED LATER.
 
  • #12
Dr.D said:
This gets right to the heart of the question. The answer is because what mathematics teaches us about logical thinking. This is not to say that logic cannot be applied in literature, because it certainly can be done. But literature can also be studied on a non-logical basis, looking only at emotions and fuzzy thought. That last approach simply does not work for algebra.

Unfortunately, algebra can also be "practiced" to a limited degree with very little thought. If a student simply learns "When you see this sort of problem, you execute these steps to solve it," that has little or no value. But if the student learns to think about what he is doing, why this leads to the solution, then we have the value of algebra for the non-technical student.
I know because I can feel it in my bones, that a good discussion should be possible, describing how dealing with Algebra, computer programming, can help a person to form an outline of a critique report about a piece of literature or a fictional film; and then let the person's own artistry guide him as he fill this outline.
 
  • #13
@ symbolipoint: I don't think anyone would argue that STEM students do not need Algebra. The primary question, as I see it, is whether other students need this as a degree requirement or not.

A major premise of education down to the present time is that it should broaden the student, and enable them to think more logically than when they began their studies. All of mathematics may be viewed as nothing more than a formal system of logic, and the small part of that that comprises College Algebra has long been seen as a minimum for anyone holding even an Associate degree. The ability to think logically, to reason correctly, is important in every aspect of life, even for folks who never later solve a quadratic equation.
 
  • Like
Likes I like Serena, swampwiz and vela
  • #14
Dr.D said:
@ symbolipoint: I don't think anyone would argue that STEM students do not need Algebra. The primary question, as I see it, is whether other students need this as a degree requirement or not.

A major premise of education down to the present time is that it should broaden the student, and enable them to think more logically than when they began their studies. All of mathematics may be viewed as nothing more than a formal system of logic, and the small part of that that comprises College Algebra has long been seen as a minimum for anyone holding even an Associate degree. The ability to think logically, to reason correctly, is important in every aspect of life, even for folks who never later solve a quadratic equation.
Dr. D,
I understand what you mean. My opinion is, for non STEM students, just make Intermediate Algebra the requirement for A.A. degree from community college. People will still disagree and say that this "Intermediate" level algebra is still too tough and 'unnecessary'.
 
  • #15
PhotonSSBM said:
Can you tell me what value is added to someone who wants to be a physical therapist by being able to reduce a rational expression?
I'm reminded of my sister, who started her college studies after having kids. She succeeded in completing the program to get her RN (Registered Nurse) degree/certificate. Being a nurse is not quite the same as being a physical therapist, but there are similarities. One thing she had to learn was how to calculate the correct dosage of some drug based on patient's weight. Although she wasn't reducing a rational expression, she was solving a fairly simple equation involving fractional quantities. If she had not been exposed to algebra earlier in her program, she wouldn't have had a clue as to how to proceed.

For a physical therapist, being mindful of the stresses and strains on joints such as knees and elbows has to do with leverage, and proportions. If you are seated and use your foot to lift a weight of 10 lb., would you as a physical therapist be able to calculate the force exerted on your knee in lifting this weigth?

I can see that being able to simplify rational expressions might not be germane to some studies, but your example of a physical therapist doesn't seem to me to be one of those.
 
  • Like
Likes SciencewithDrJ, I like Serena, mathwonk and 2 others
  • #16
PhotonSSBM said:
Can you tell me what value is added to someone who wants to be a physical therapist by being able to reduce a rational expression?

About the same as it is for whatever they get from an extra class in Literature.

PhotonSSBM said:
Edit: To summarize, why do we require such a high degree of mastery for math, and not say, Literature?

Now you're starting to get to the heart of the matter. I looked at the AA/AS requirements and also the graduation requirements for California high schools. In English and Math they are the same: one course post-HS. So what's the problem? Probably that the high schools looked the other way when their students didn't really know Algebra I and graduated them anyway.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and Dr. Courtney
  • #17
Mark44 said:
I'm reminded of my sister, who started her college studies after having kids. She succeeded in completing the program to get her RN (Registered Nurse) degree/certificate. Being a nurse is not quite the same as being a physical therapist, but there are similarities. One thing she had to learn was how to calculate the correct dosage of some drug based on patient's weight. Although she wasn't reducing a rational expression, she was solving a fairly simple equation involving fractional quantities. If she had not been exposed to algebra earlier in her program, she wouldn't have had a clue as to how to proceed.

For a physical therapist, being mindful of the stresses and strains on joints such as knees and elbows has to do with leverage, and proportions. If you are seated and use your foot to lift a weight of 10 lb., would you as a physical therapist be able to calculate the force exerted on your knee in lifting this weigth?

I can see that being able to simplify rational expressions might not be germane to some studies, but your example of a physical therapist doesn't seem to me to be one of those.
I really LIKE this posting quoted above and I wish I could put in two more LIKES. Naturally, this forum system does not allow it.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #18
symbolipoint said:
After just reading this part of the post, and no more yet, I have this opinion...

Intermediate Algebra, as the minimum, should be required for any student wishing to earn an Associate Degree of , I would like to say, ANY major, from a community college. Although recheck should be done, my understanding is that at least "College Algebra" is required; and some major fields require either "Finite Math" or "Intro. Statistics", and of course anyone aiming in STEM for a degree from community college has other or additional Mathematics requirements (like Calculus 1, 2, or also 3; and some parts of linear algebra or differential equations). The STEM students need the additional mathematics skills and concepts for some of their relevant courses.

Requirements for all degrees at community college usually boils down to one of three things:
1. Pass intermediate algebra with a D or greater (The buildup to this can be upwards of 3 courses: Arithmetic, College Algebra, Intermediate Algerba)
2. Pass a math class specific to your degree (a medical mathematics class for instance)
3. If you test out of Intermediate algebra, and 2 does not apply, pass the next highest math course possible.

And of course if you are majoring in STEM you'll take more as you say.

The issue isn't so much that math, or even algebra, is required. It is the extent and magnitude to which we require mathematical rigor from students. Which I will address in the next quote.

Mark44 said:
I'm reminded of my sister, who started her college studies after having kids. She succeeded in completing the program to get her RN (Registered Nurse) degree/certificate. Being a nurse is not quite the same as being a physical therapist, but there are similarities. One thing she had to learn was how to calculate the correct dosage of some drug based on patient's weight. Although she wasn't reducing a rational expression, she was solving a fairly simple equation involving fractional quantities. If she had not been exposed to algebra earlier in her program, she wouldn't have had a clue as to how to proceed.

For a physical therapist, being mindful of the stresses and strains on joints such as knees and elbows has to do with leverage, and proportions. If you are seated and use your foot to lift a weight of 10 lb., would you as a physical therapist be able to calculate the force exerted on your knee in lifting this weigth?

I can see that being able to simplify rational expressions might not be germane to some studies, but your example of a physical therapist doesn't seem to me to be one of those.

I truly appreciate your sentiment. And I would never suggest that NO mathematical background be present in a degree. I would even say that many aspects of algebra are essential to being an informed citizen-namely creating and interpreting plots.

But let me raise an objection to your point here. I tutor nursing students on the regular at my old school, among others. Intermediate Algebra is a prerequisite to even being considered for the nursing program. And while they are a CC, their program is competitive due to it's low tuition. With that being said, our school has one of the highest failure rates on the state exams for the RN program and has a failure rate within the program that is quite high. This isn't unusual, but do you want to venture a guess as to why they fail?

It's math. They are allowed one failure of the dosage and conversions exams (failure is <90%) and if they fail again, they are out. This, in itself, is not the issue. Nurses should be held to a higher standard. However, this is the number one reason people fail. Now, it's worth noting here that within the program there is math course dedicated to this subject. It is not something one learns in Intermediate Algebra. So why is it that such a large portion of students fail a math portion of a program when they had to do excellent in math to enter the program in the first place. I would argue that it is because Intermediate Algebra, except in the case of specific STEM programs, does not give the mathematical skills necessary to do math that a person may use in their field. Learning how to simplify a rational expression, find the sum of a geometric series, and memorizing the equation of an ellipse do not add any value to a degree or most peoples mathematical tool kits.

Again, I am in no way suggesting math isn't useful. But I believe if we are to require math as a general education requirement in the same way as we do courses like literature, history and art, we should have the same approach to teaching both at the same level.

Let me flesh something out to you and see if you agree with me:

1. We should maintain algebra up to the level of college algebra (basic equations, plotting lines, factoring)
2. Incorporate basic statistics into arithmetic and college algebra.
3. Incorporate spreadsheet uses and basic programming as a mandatory gen ed.
4. Reduce effective number of required math classes to 2 instead of 3 (Arithmetic and College Algebra)
5. Encourage students to take math courses specific to their fields. (i.e. what our nursing program does) As opposed to just intermediate algebra.

I believe this would be better suited to a person seeking a general education in mathematics. Would you do things differently? I'd genuinely like to hear yours and others' opinions.

Vanadium 50 said:
Now you're starting to get to the heart of the matter. I looked at the AA/AS requirements and also the graduation requirements for California high schools. In English and Math they are the same: one course post-HS. So what's the problem? Probably that the high schools looked the other way when their students didn't really know Algebra I and graduated them anyway.

You highlight such an important point when thinking about this problem. Right now CC's are at an impasse. They pull funding from FAFSA's and state grants by the millions, yet most of the students who get those grants don't graduate or transfer to a good school because they can't pass mathematics. That is the struggle they face right now. This is, as you point out, largely due to an inefficient and obtuse secondary education system in this country. Students come out of low income schools and GED programs with almost no real preparation for mathematics due to negligence and mismanagement. Their only option for developing their careers are either retail, pursuing an education at CC, or going to trade school. In their current state, CC's are becoming a non-viable option for these students. And they are being left behind. So the question I and others have raised who are in these communities teaching these students is, what can we do better? Because what's going on right now isn't working. Both for the students, and on the business side of the school where grants may stop coming to schools who can't pass more of these students through algebra. I'd be curious to what you think a better solution is if any to this problem, and what you think of my ideas.
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
  • #19
PhotonSSBM

True point about some math skills instructed in Intermediate Algebra, but other math skills emphasized in the nursing programs after Intermed Algebra. I cannot remember any strong focus on unit-of-measure conversions when studied Intermediate Algebra, NOR in College Algebra. There was a bit of attention on it, but not much. Nursing students, if they have a separate mathematical component , might/or/do have some courses which instruct about many, many units and their conversion ratios. The same idea happens with Physics and Chemistry major fields.
 
  • #20
PhotonSSBM said:
The chancellor of the California Community Colleges system believes that students who are not majoring in math or science should not have to take intermediate algebra to earn an associate degree.
I'd say he should be fired immediately, but since it is California, I'll say give him a raise and more responsibility instead.
What do you think? Is algebra necessary for students who don't plan to pursue a career in the sciences? -Physics Today

Most community college students I tutor are there because they had a pretty garbage life, and more often than not had a pretty garbage school district. Expecting a grown up to learn the math of grades 1-10 in a year and a half is something I have always believed to be ridiculous. It can be done, but more often than not it just doesn't happen. I believe for the community college program in this country to succeed in helping more students get out of poverty we at the very least need to rethink how we teach math.
In high school, I had math classes, science classes, English classes, social studies (history) classes, music classes, phys-ed classes, health classes, etc. Algebra was a relatively low-level class (I took my last algebra class as a sophomore). So what you are basically saying is that it is pretty easy to fake it in other classes where the scoring is more qualitative, but math is harder because there are clear-cut right and wrong answers...so we shouldn't force people to learn it.

I agree with you, but I'd take it a step further: Why force them to learn anything? Why not just hand-out associates degrees to everyone who doesn't have one and is at risk of falling into poverty? Sound ridiculous? Why?
PhotonSSBM said:
Can you tell me what value is added to someone who wants to be a physical therapist by being able to reduce a rational expression? An argument can easily be made that everyone uses math regularly, it's the level of which we require math to be mastered that's the issue. But how does being able to reduce a rational expression add to the value of such degrees where, guess what, nobody cares what you got in a math class unless you failed it.

Edit: To summarize, why do we require such a high degree of mastery for math, and not say, Literature?
I agree, but de-valuing the degree will only work if we don't tell anyone we're de-valuing the degree. So don't tell anyone, ok?!
[/California]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Bystander, bhobba and Dr. Courtney
  • #21
Vanadium 50 said:
Now you're starting to get to the heart of the matter. I looked at the AA/AS requirements and also the graduation requirements for California high schools. In English and Math they are the same: one course post-HS. So what's the problem? Probably that the high schools looked the other way when their students didn't really know Algebra I and graduated them anyway.
I agree; schools should be giving partial credit in math assignments for earnestness.
[/California]
 
  • #22
Just now checked one of the C.C. catalogs. There are various requirements for Mathematics, depending on the specific academic or training program. Intermediate Algebra is just ONE OF the options for A.A. Degree Mathematics requirement. There are other options which include College Algebra.
 
  • #23
symbolipoint said:
Just now checked one of the C.C. catalogs. There are various requirements for Mathematics, depending on the specific academic or training program. Intermediate Algebra is just ONE OF the options for A.A. Degree Mathematics requirement. There are other options which include College Algebra.

Ah that's good to hear. My schools and others in PA have a requirement of at least one class above College Algebra. It is interesting to hear that's not a national standard.

russ_watters said:
stuff

I get what you're trying to say. Really it's not like it hasn't crossed my mind that people are just lazy and refuse to learn difficult things. And I will be the first to say that about a third of CC students match that description. But that doesn't explain how 75% of the students who enter my CC here in Pittsburgh flunk out before graduating. It was so bad that we lied to the government about it.

So, I'm sure you, at least, agree that there's a problem. We seem to disagree about what that problem is. Here are the options:

1. Students in low income situations are lazy or ignorant of how to properly be a student
2. The way we are teaching algebra is wrong
3. Algebra is wrong
4. The quality of the school is garbage, so the free market should raise its scythe accordingly
5. Some combination of the above

I personally believe it's a combination of 1,2, and in many cases 4.

Certainly you agree that the drop out/failure rates are a problem for schools from a pragmatic point of view at least. From a business perspective they aren't delivering their product (Degrees) to their customers (Students), at a rate that any business should be able to function, and that's not just in Pittsburgh, it's everywhere. What do you propose the problem/solution is if you disagree with making it easier to graduate?
 
  • #24
PhotonSSBM said:
The buildup to this can be upwards of 3 courses: Arithmetic, College Algebra, Intermediate Algerba

If a student enters CC without knowing arithmetic, the K-12 system has failed. They have taken someone who didn't know the material and kicked the can down the road to the next station in the chain, most likely several times. I mean we're talking junior high material being still unlearned for someone who wants to start college. Yipes!

I agree this is a problem. I disagree the solution is to do the same thing as what got us into this mess: relax the requirements and kick the can further down the road.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander and Dr. Courtney
  • #25
Vanadium 50 said:
If a student enters CC without knowing arithmetic, the K-12 system has failed. They have taken someone who didn't know the material and kicked the can down the road to the next station in the chain, most likely several times. I mean we're talking junior high material being still unlearned for someone who wants to start college. Yipes!

I agree this is a problem. I disagree the solution is to do the same thing as what got us into this mess: relax the requirements and kick the can further down the road.
Except I would argue the problem isn't that requirements are being relaxed in K-12 schools, it's that they're being thrown out all together. It's like this: a student in a low income school is a problem to a class, the teacher doesn't want them repeating, so they just straight up pass the student with a D so they don't have to see them again. That's not just being relaxed, it's being dead in the water. All I would suggest is that we keep our high standards for the classes we DO teach, but change the curriculum to be more pragmatic and more useful to the student in the longterm, see my outline above.
 
  • #26
I received my education in Canada, so I'm unfamiliar with the requirements of an Associates Degree at American community colleges. I'm specifically curious about what is typically covered in the (required) algebra class in community colleges. Does anyone have a link to a typical syllabus or a typical textbook that is used for such classes?
 
  • #27
StatGuy2000 said:
I received my education in Canada, so I'm unfamiliar with the requirements of an Associates Degree at American community colleges. I'm specifically curious about what is typically covered in the (required) algebra class in community colleges. Does anyone have a link to a typical syllabus or a typical textbook that is used for such classes?

Course Syllabi for math classes in my county's CC:

https://webapps.ccac.edu/mastersyllabi/GetCourses/tabid/57/Default.aspx?subject=MAT

The typical sequence for non-STEM majors is MATH 080, MATH 090, and MATH 108. You can test out of one or all of the classes. But will be required to take one higher if you test out of 108.
 
  • #28
It's pretty basic stuff, and they want to cut it from the requirement? Our country is already stagnating as it is. Technology is rapidly improving and society simply needs to get smarter to keep up. The days of simple tasks are more or less coming to an end. So the rational thing to do is to improve education and skills as much as possible, not keep cutting standards.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and symbolipoint
  • #29
PhotonSSBM said:
Course Syllabi for math classes in my county's CC:

https://webapps.ccac.edu/mastersyllabi/GetCourses/tabid/57/Default.aspx?subject=MAT

The typical sequence for non-STEM majors is MATH 080, MATH 090, and MATH 108. You can test out of one or all of the classes. But will be required to take one higher if you test out of 108.
The table in there shows at that college, MATH 108 is Intermediate Algebra at that school.
 
  • #30
PhotonSSBM said:
I get what you're trying to say. Really it's not like it hasn't crossed my mind that people are just lazy and refuse to learn difficult things. And I will be the first to say that about a third of CC students match that description. But that doesn't explain how 75% of the students who enter my CC here in Pittsburgh flunk out before graduating. It was so bad that we lied to the government about it.

So, I'm sure you, at least, agree that there's a problem. We seem to disagree about what that problem is. Here are the options:

1. Students in low income situations are lazy or ignorant of how to properly be a student
2. The way we are teaching algebra is wrong
3. Algebra is wrong
4. The quality of the school is garbage, so the free market should raise its scythe accordingly
5. Some combination of the above

I personally believe it's a combination of 1,2, and in many cases 4.
You forgot probably the biggest; the other side of the coin from #1: high schools aren't preparing students.
Certainly you agree that the drop out/failure rates are a problem for schools from a pragmatic point of view at least. From a business perspective they aren't delivering their product (Degrees) to their customers (Students), at a rate that any business should be able to function...
What? When you go to a car dealership, do you say "Here is a big bag of money, just give me any car you feel like giving me."? Why are you suggesting that here? No, I certainly did not go to college in order to get a worthless piece of paper. De-valuing it will make the problem(worhless college educations) worse, not better.

In either case, you are wrong about the business model: colleges don't get paid for graduating students, they get paid for enrolling them.
What do you propose the problem/solution is if you disagree with making it easier to graduate?
Make it harder to enter college and make it harder to graduate high school (and advance at every level).
 
  • Like
Likes Dr. Courtney
  • #31
From what I heard on the radio last week my understanding is that the proposal is to replace the requirement of algebra with a different mathematics course that is more 'practical.'

Dr.D said:
This gets right to the heart of the question. The answer is because what mathematics teaches us about logical thinking.

If this is indeed the reason for requiring all students to take math (seems reasonable to me) then what California should do is come up with a clear set of standards about logical reasoning, advertise which courses allow students to demonstrate their level mastery in these standards, and allow students to pick the course. Students could perhaps opt for a course in propositional logic, philosophy, or rhetoric to meet the requirement. If quantitative reasoning is part of what is valued then a math or science course is probably inescapable. Why not allow a student to use a geometry course as evidence of logical reasoning instead? Of course, many of the courses would likely need an overhaul in pedagogy based on

Dr.D said:
Unfortunately, [insert any course name here] can also be "practiced" to a limited degree with very little thought. If a student simply learns "When you see this sort of problem, you execute these steps to solve it," that has little or no value. But if the student learns to think about what he is doing, why this leads to the solution, then we have the value of algebra for the non-technical student.
 
  • #32
russ_watters said:
You forgot probably the biggest; the other side of the coin from #1: high schools aren't preparing students.

What? When you go to a car dealership, do you say "Here is a big bag of money, just give me any car you feel like giving me."? Why are you suggesting that here? No, I certainly did not go to college in order to get a worthless piece of paper. De-valuing it will make the problem(worhless college educations) worse, not better.

In either case, you are wrong about the business model: colleges don't get paid for graduating students, they get paid for enrolling them.

Make it harder to enter college and make it harder to graduate high school (and advance at every level).
brainpushups said:
From what I heard on the radio last week my understanding is that the proposal is to replace the requirement of algebra with a different mathematics course that is more 'practical.'
If this is indeed the reason for requiring all students to take math (seems reasonable to me) then what California should do is come up with a clear set of standards about logical reasoning, advertise which courses allow students to demonstrate their level mastery in these standards, and allow students to pick the course. Students could perhaps opt for a course in propositional logic, philosophy, or rhetoric to meet the requirement. If quantitative reasoning is part of what is valued then a math or science course is probably inescapable. Why not allow a student to use a geometry course as evidence of logical reasoning instead? Of course, many of the courses would likely need an overhaul in pedagogy based on
Some often ask the question, why is Algebra difficult, and also the question, why are students failing algebra 1?
Those asking or others, should also ask, why did those students who did succeed in Algebra 1, do so?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
  • #33
russ_watters said:
You forgot probably the biggest; the other side of the coin from #1: high schools aren't preparing students.

I agree and discussed this earlier, but this is a problem that CC's have to address now, as I'll show next.

What? When you go to a car dealership, do you say "Here is a big bag of money, just give me any car you feel like giving me."? Why are you suggesting that here? No, I certainly did not go to college in order to get a worthless piece of paper. De-valuing it will make the problem(worhless college educations) worse, not better.

In either case, you are wrong about the business model: colleges don't get paid for graduating students, they get paid for enrolling them.

That's not what I'm saying or suggesting in either statement here. You keep assuming I want to get rid of Intermediate Algebra without adding something back. I made this point earlier, but apparently you didn't feel the need to read it, or you disagree with it but didn't feel like addressing it.

I am not wrong about the business model. You completely missed the point, which is that people will stop enrolling if failures and dropouts continue to go unabated, and federal grants will no longer be issued to those school if they can't graduate more students.

Make it harder to enter college and make it harder to graduate high school (and advance at every level).
I have to think about this more before I agree or disagree with it.
 
  • #34
symbolipoint said:
The table in there shows at that college, MATH 108 is Intermediate Algebra at that school.
Correct, I don't think I suggested anything to the contrary.
 
  • #35
FallenApple said:
It's pretty basic stuff, and they want to cut it from the requirement? Our country is already stagnating as it is. Technology is rapidly improving and society simply needs to get smarter to keep up. The days of simple tasks are more or less coming to an end. So the rational thing to do is to improve education and skills as much as possible, not keep cutting standards.
I see your point, but nobody is suggesting that intermediate algebra not be offered to students, just that it shouldn't be mandatory. AND that we should replace the unnecessary portions of the class with practical skills. As I said earlier, learning how to code a spreadsheet is way more practical AND marketable than being able to factor a fourth degree polynomial.
 
<h2>1. What is the purpose of requiring Algebra at community colleges?</h2><p>The purpose of requiring Algebra at community colleges is to provide students with a strong foundation in mathematical reasoning and problem-solving skills. These skills are essential for success in many fields, including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.</p><h2>2. Is Algebra necessary for all majors at community colleges?</h2><p>No, Algebra is not necessary for all majors at community colleges. However, it is a prerequisite for many courses and majors, such as science, engineering, and business. Even for students pursuing non-STEM majors, Algebra can still be beneficial in developing critical thinking skills.</p><h2>3. Can students opt out of taking Algebra at community colleges?</h2><p>It depends on the community college and the specific major or program. Some community colleges may have alternative math courses that fulfill the Algebra requirement, while others may allow students to test out of Algebra if they have already taken it in high school or have demonstrated proficiency in the subject.</p><h2>4. What are the potential consequences of not taking Algebra at community colleges?</h2><p>Not taking Algebra at community colleges may limit students' options for majors and courses, as well as hinder their academic and career opportunities. Additionally, Algebra provides valuable problem-solving skills that are applicable in various fields and everyday life.</p><h2>5. How can community colleges support students who struggle with Algebra?</h2><p>Community colleges can support students who struggle with Algebra by offering tutoring services, study groups, and additional resources such as online tutorials and practice problems. They can also provide accommodations for students with learning disabilities or offer alternative courses that cover similar mathematical concepts.</p>

1. What is the purpose of requiring Algebra at community colleges?

The purpose of requiring Algebra at community colleges is to provide students with a strong foundation in mathematical reasoning and problem-solving skills. These skills are essential for success in many fields, including science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.

2. Is Algebra necessary for all majors at community colleges?

No, Algebra is not necessary for all majors at community colleges. However, it is a prerequisite for many courses and majors, such as science, engineering, and business. Even for students pursuing non-STEM majors, Algebra can still be beneficial in developing critical thinking skills.

3. Can students opt out of taking Algebra at community colleges?

It depends on the community college and the specific major or program. Some community colleges may have alternative math courses that fulfill the Algebra requirement, while others may allow students to test out of Algebra if they have already taken it in high school or have demonstrated proficiency in the subject.

4. What are the potential consequences of not taking Algebra at community colleges?

Not taking Algebra at community colleges may limit students' options for majors and courses, as well as hinder their academic and career opportunities. Additionally, Algebra provides valuable problem-solving skills that are applicable in various fields and everyday life.

5. How can community colleges support students who struggle with Algebra?

Community colleges can support students who struggle with Algebra by offering tutoring services, study groups, and additional resources such as online tutorials and practice problems. They can also provide accommodations for students with learning disabilities or offer alternative courses that cover similar mathematical concepts.

Similar threads

  • STEM Educators and Teaching
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Career Guidance
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • STEM Educators and Teaching
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top