Should be a basic complex analysis question

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that an entire bijection with a non-zero derivative must take the form f(z) = az + b, where a and b are complex numbers. Participants explore the implications of Liouville's Theorem, noting that if f' is bounded, it must be constant, which leads to the conclusion about the linear form of f. The role of bijectiveness is emphasized, as examples like f(z) = e^z demonstrate that not all entire functions with non-zero derivatives are linear. The conversation also touches on the Taylor series expansion and the nature of singularities, particularly referencing Picard's Theorem to argue against essential singularities. Overall, the thread highlights the connection between the properties of entire functions and their structural forms.
kcuf
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f:C-> C be an entire bijection with a never zero derivative, then f(z)=az+b for a,b\in C

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure where to begin with this problem. The only ways I see to attack this are based on somehow showing that f' is bounded and then use Liouville's Theorem to conclude that f' is constant.

I don't know what role being a bijection plays in this, however I know it is necessary because z-> e^z is entire with a never zero derivative, but clearly does not have the form given.

Also, it clearly can't be a polynomial of degree greater than 1 because of f'\neq0 and the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, but I don't know how to exclude a function of another form. I've been thinking about the Taylor series expansion of f, but I'm not sure why having an infinite number of terms be nonzero (otherwise it would be a polynomial) contradict either f' never zero or f being bijective.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking about g(z)=f(1/z). g(z) has some kind of singularity at zero. Can you say what kind it can't be?
 
Interesting, it can't be an essential singularity because Picard's Theorem would then yield that f is not injective.

Thanks for the help!
 
Very welcome. A hint was all you needed. Great!
 
Ya, I just couldn't see how to connect the properties of f to reach the desired result until your hint.

Thanks again for the help.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K