Should I install my OS on a low-capacity SSD?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kutt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    install Os Ssd
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Installing an operating system on a low-capacity SSD significantly enhances boot times and overall system performance. Recommended SSDs for Windows 8 installation include the Crucial M4, Samsung 840, and OCZ Agility 3, with a minimum capacity of 128GB advised for optimal use. Users should consider a secondary HDD for data storage to maintain SSD performance. While OCZ drives have historically had high failure rates, recent models show improvement, but Intel and Samsung remain preferred for reliability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SSD technology and performance benefits
  • Familiarity with Windows 8 installation requirements
  • Knowledge of SATA III interface specifications
  • Basic skills in managing data storage solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the performance differences between SSD brands like Crucial, Samsung, and Intel
  • Learn about SSD maintenance and data management strategies
  • Explore the benefits of using a secondary HDD for data storage
  • Investigate the latest advancements in SSD technology and reliability
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for gamers, PC builders, and anyone looking to optimize their system performance through effective storage solutions.

Kutt
Messages
237
Reaction score
1
I'm putting together a new high-performance gaming rig and wanted to ask someone here if they could recommend a fast SATA III low-capacity solid state drive to install Windows 8 on.

Boot times should be dramatically faster compared to an HDD.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
You could probably do with a 120GB SSD. Big enough for windows and a couple games to be installed and run from the drive. I would get a 2nd normal drive used for data storage. But yes, an SSD would noticbly improve your system's performance

i'd go for one of these 3
OCZ Vertex 3
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-227-706&IsVirtualParent=1

Crucial M4
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-148-442&IsVirtualParent=1

OCZ Agility 3 (We have a few of these at work)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=20-227-726&IsVirtualParent=1
 
I wouldn't recommend OCZ drives. They have the highest failure rates of all manufacturers.

The Crucial M4 is a good one, either that or a Samsung 840 (if you are able to obtain a Samsung 830 for the same money, go for this instead).

64 GB is to small, you should either go for 128 or 256 GB.
 
Agree entirely with clancy688. The system SSD will transform your PC experience.
Also agree that 128 GB is adequate if you are very disciplined about keeping your data and media files on a separate drive. If you are casual about putting stuff away, a 256 GB drive is a better bet.
The latest OCZ drives have apparently gotten noticeably better, but for a user happier with products that are made by the supplier, rather than repackaged merchant market chips, Intel, Samsung or Crucial (Micron Technologies) fill the bill.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
684
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
14K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K