Should I send my GRE scores if they're not required?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Only a Mirage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gre
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around concerns regarding GRE scores and their impact on graduate school applications, particularly for top electrical engineering programs. The individual achieved a 164 in both the quantitative and verbal sections, alongside a 5 in writing, with a strong GPA of 3.97. There is uncertainty about whether to submit these scores to schools like MIT that do not require them, with the belief that not submitting might imply even lower scores. However, responses indicate that the GRE scores are sufficient and should not hinder admission chances at top schools. Emphasis is placed on the importance of research experience, recommendation letters, and the overall application narrative, suggesting that GRE scores serve primarily as a filtering tool. It is advised not to submit scores to schools that do not require them, as they may not be beneficial. The focus should shift towards enhancing other application components, such as a compelling statement of purpose.
Only a Mirage
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Here's the deal: I took the GRE a few weeks ago. Didn't do as well as I'd hoped in the quantitative section. I received

164 (90th percentile) Quantitative (93rd Percentile) 164 Verbal (92nd percentile) 5 Writing

I was planning on applying to top grad schools in electrical engineering, e.g. MIT, Stanford, Berkeley, etc., as well as safety schools. But I'm hoping to go to a top 10 school.

I have a 3.97 GPA, but I don't know if my GRE scores are going to keep me out of top schools.
Some schools don't require GRE scores though, like MIT. Should I send my scores to MIT anyway? Or are they low enough that I would be better off not? And do you guys think my GRE scores are going to ruin my chances of, say, Stanford?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i may be obtuse, but what possible reason would you have for sending an unrequired piece of data that you think makes you look bad?
 
mathwonk said:
i may be obtuse, but what possible reason would you have for sending an unrequired piece of data that you think makes you look bad?

Hi mathwonk! Thanks for the response.

Here's what I was worried about. I was thinking that maybe it was still common for students to submit GRE scores to schools that don't require it, and by me not submitting my scores, schools might assume that my scores are even lower than they are.

But I guess I was just over analyzing that. Do you think my scores are low enough to prevent my admission to schools that do require it?
 
I pretty much scored the same as you on the GRE, Q:165, V:165, W:5. I will also be applying to some top 10 schools in physics, and I am fairly confident I will get in.

I highly doubt anyone is going to care that you or I didn't get 170 on the Quantitative. It just comes down to a few dumb mistakes we made, but that doesn't really say much about our research potential. Your GPA is pretty solid, so I don't think they will doubt your mathematical skills.

Also, your verbal and writing makes up for it I think. The fact that your scores all around high is not something to pass off. I actually think that how one does on the verbal is more representative of their thinking abilities than how one does on the Quantitative which is just straight up basic math. Also, schools like people who are extremely fluent in English.

So to finish. No, your GRE scores won't keep you out of the top schools. GREs are a filter. Once you make the basic cutoff plus a bit more, it all comes down to things like research experience and reference letters.

Lastly, if a school doesn't require GREs, don't send them GREs. If they wanted them they would ask.
 
nicholls said:
I pretty much scored the same as you on the GRE, Q:165, V:165, W:5. I will also be applying to some top 10 schools in physics, and I am fairly confident I will get in.

I highly doubt anyone is going to care that you or I didn't get 170 on the Quantitative. It just comes down to a few dumb mistakes we made, but that doesn't really say much about our research potential. Your GPA is pretty solid, so I don't think they will doubt your mathematical skills.

Also, your verbal and writing makes up for it I think. The fact that your scores all around high is not something to pass off. I actually think that how one does on the verbal is more representative of their thinking abilities than how one does on the Quantitative which is just straight up basic math. Also, schools like people who are extremely fluent in English.

So to finish. No, your GRE scores won't keep you out of the top schools. GREs are a filter. Once you make the basic cutoff plus a bit more, it all comes down to things like research experience and reference letters.

Lastly, if a school doesn't require GREs, don't send them GREs. If they wanted them they would ask.

Thanks a lot for taking the time to respond and for your very complete answer. Your perspective is reassuring. I don't think my letters or rec or previous research are really stellar (haven't published anything), but I guess I should just focus on the things I can change before applications are due, like writing a really strong statement of purpose.
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
83
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top