Evo
Staff Emeritus
- 24,029
- 3,323
The answer, IMO, is not to stop the grants, but put stricter limits on them. For example, if the student doesn't get a degree within a set timeframe, the grants must be repaid. That might discourage a number of applicants upfront if they're not serious.FlexGunship said:A subsidy is kind of welfare, though. Right? It's the government using your money to make something cheaper to help you pay for it when you normally wouldn't. Subsidy money comes from your pockets anyway. Fundamentally there isn't a difference, except that higher education isn't a staple of existence (like food or shelter).
Financial aid for higher education is like a kind of frivolous welfare. A luxurious welfare. If there were no subsidies, and no one could afford to attend colleges and universities, you'd better believe that would drive prices down.
The problem is that we're creating those higher wage earners at the expense of the higher wage payers.
